Steven Avery
Administrator
Friedrich Ernst Kettner (1671-1722)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Ernst_Kettner
Sabellian reason (mentioned by Porson)
https://books.google.com/books?id=yjJBAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA83
Reasons are in:
Historia Dicti Johannei De Sanctissima Trinitate, 1. Joh. Cap. V. vers. 7: Per Multa Secula Omissi, Seculo V. Restituti, Et Exeunte Seculo XVI. In Versionem Vernaculam Recepti, Una Cum Apologia B. Lutheri (1713)
Friedrich Ernst Kettner
https://books.google.com/books?id=yjJBAAAAAAJ&pg=PA137
Porson references
http://books.google.com/books?id=jPLfAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA224
http://books.google.com/books?id=_btdAAAAcAAJ&pg=PR3
Monthly Review gives Kettner Latin
http://books.google.com/books?id=zD4oAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA44
Horne comments
http://books.google.com/books?id=yjMHAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA2-PA243 (1821)
http://books.google.com/books?id=y_opAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA483 (1828)
https://books.google.com/books?id=lHJLAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA372
Erasmus
https://books.google.com/books?id=yjJBAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA178
Grantley has him negative on Jerome's authorship of the Vulgate Prologue, Porson said he flipped pro to con.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Ernst_Kettner
Sabellian reason (mentioned by Porson)
https://books.google.com/books?id=yjJBAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA83
Reasons are in:
Historia Dicti Johannei De Sanctissima Trinitate, 1. Joh. Cap. V. vers. 7: Per Multa Secula Omissi, Seculo V. Restituti, Et Exeunte Seculo XVI. In Versionem Vernaculam Recepti, Una Cum Apologia B. Lutheri (1713)
Friedrich Ernst Kettner
https://books.google.com/books?id=yjJBAAAAAAJ&pg=PA137
Porson references
http://books.google.com/books?id=jPLfAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA224
http://books.google.com/books?id=_btdAAAAcAAJ&pg=PR3
Monthly Review gives Kettner Latin
http://books.google.com/books?id=zD4oAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA44
Horne comments
http://books.google.com/books?id=yjMHAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA2-PA243 (1821)
http://books.google.com/books?id=y_opAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA483 (1828)
5. Further, those critics who advocate the genuineness of this text, observe that omissions in antient manuscripts, versions, and authors, are neither absolute contradictions, nor direct impeachments of facts. They only supply food for conjecture, and conjectural criticism ought to be sparingly and cautiously applied before it can be admitted as sufficient authority for altering the received text. Besides, the omission in the present case may be satisfactorily accounted for, from various circumstances.
https://books.google.com/books?id=lHJLAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA372
Erasmus
https://books.google.com/books?id=yjJBAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA178
Grantley has him negative on Jerome's authorship of the Vulgate Prologue, Porson said he flipped pro to con.
Last edited: