Search results

I evaluated correction by correction and drew conclusion at the end of the pictures. I did not do it by scribe. Now that the overall is done I hope to do that.

I do not feel capable of making the judgment call you are asking me to make. I would need a comprehensive knowledge of non-biblical manuscripts through the ages to decide when a letter form may have appeared. If we post without knowing someone is going to post an obscure manuscript that proves...

email sent. you should have a copy in your box.

Sardius is missing in the list of churches in Rev 1.11. It is corrected in the margin. To me i see letter forms that make me doubt that the original author did the correction. Ink looks similar so probably was done when it was written. Probably a homeoarchy

So we find that the ε, which comes before N (it is an A which comes before the omitted N) in AXTEPAN (ASTERAN) Matth. 11, 2 (The passage is actually Matthew 2:10) is inserted (the E is in its natural spot by the hand of the original scribe), shows the same form and the same ink as the rest of...

● In Jude verse 3, there is a contest, mainly between κοινῆς σωτηρίας (favored by a majority of manuscripts) and κοινῆς ἡμῶν σωτηρίας. Although the latter was adopted in Nestle-Aland (and by Tregelles and Souter – but not by Scholz,), it is not easy to discern why any scribe whose exemplar had...

Tommy Wasserman again on Jude 1:3 more recent than James Snapp TC-Alternate above. "A few witnesses, including the nucleus HK group, replace σωτηρίας with ζωής (1505 1611 2138 S:HPh), whereas a few important MSS attest a conflation, τής κοινής ήμών σωτηρίας και ζωής (01 (א) 044 2627Ζ). The...

The definite article does not appear with the infinitive in KOINE Greek. it did at time in Homeric Greek. For that reason and its sparce appearance in the Manuscript evidence א and ψ (044 - from Athos) with one miniscule 1735 stand against the vast majority of manuscripts

Do we know what Χρηστιανους meant to the contemporaries of the manuscript? Are we jumping to a conclusion based on our own conjectures. Could it be the the long a/e sound was a contemporary assimilation of the ει dipthong? We know that the Italian based manuscripts had no trouble dropping the...

translatrion of the paragraph starting out οταν διαβασα το βιβλιο . . . when I read the book by Rudiger Shaper where he describes benedict as a dark person, a contradiction was created in me. He describes him as ¨... a scoundrel with a cross" the Holy Benedict

So the real facts are completely different. The ones that writes Schaper are fabrications. He also notices Simonides who says that Benedictus was an abbot. But a little research leaves us with stunned in front of the undeniable personality and greatness of his character. As can be seen from...

+

Constantius who was bishop at Sinai, wise and very good at paleography much better than Tischendorf, if he knew this (for he studied the library of Sinai not as a stranger but as its master) and the wise Economist who published the four books about the seventy interpreters of the old testament...

Since Mr. Simonides never visited Mount Sinai, but only went to Alexandria, and immediately afterwards went to England, where he is now, he is lying when he affirms positively that the ancient manuscript of the Bible, published by Mr. Tischendorf, is his work, because the manuscript in question...

Jerome's note: Which many, being ignorant of, think taken from the thirteenth psalm, those verses [Grk] in the Vulgate edition [i. e. the (Grk) the LXX] have been added and are not considered in the Hebrew (Hieron. Opp. ed. Migne