Ambrose of Milan

[Steven Avery]

Raymond Brown has him as an omitter

Ambrose of Milan refs:

[1.] “On Mysteries,” “De Mysteriis,” Chapter 4, Section 20 [MPL Vol. 16, Col. 394]
[2.] “On The Holy Spirit,” “De Spiritu Sancto,” Book 1, Chapter 6, Section 77 [MPL Vol. 16, Col. 725]
[3.] “On The Holy Spirit,” “De Spiritu Sancto,” Book 1, Chapter 13, Section 159 [= reference to 1st John 5:6].
[4.] “On The Holy Spirit,” “De Spiritu Sancto,” Book 3, Chapter 10, Section 67 [MPL Vol. 16, Col. 792]
[5.] “Exposition in Luke,” “Expositio Evangelii Secundum Lucam,” Book 10, Chapter 48, Section 5 [Last Verse] [MPL Vol. 15, Col. 1815-1816]

BVBD -- Matt13weedhacker
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/bib...nneum-and-raymond-brown-t5746-s10.html#p69946

=================================================

Gavin Basil McGrath
https://www.facebook.com/groups/purebible/permalink/931123550312868/?comment_id=2715062985252240

brandpluckt
the Comma Is absent from the writings of the following major Latin theologians: Hilary of Poitiers (d. 367) who wrote on the Trinity; Ambrose (d.. 397) who cited I John 5:7—8 four times; Leo the Great (d. 461); and Gregory the Great (d. 604).

Hugh Houghton on Latin omitters
https://books.google.com/books?id=CXQqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA179
Ambrose, Rufinus, Augustine, Quodvultdeus, and other authors.

Grantley - RGA 126-127
And if the codices of the orthodox included this reading, why did Athanasius, Didymus, Gregory Nazianzen, Chrysostom, Theophylact, Cyril, Ambrose, Hilary and Augustine all fail to cite it against the Arians? “I do not know,” Erasmus sighed in resignation

 

[Steven Avery]

Ambrose - On the Mysteries
[1.] “On Mysteries,” “De Mysteriis,” Chapter 4, Section 20 [MPL Vol. 16, Col. 394]
https://books.google.com/books?id=goLYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA52

de Myst. iv. 20; Col. iv. 3 (aperiatur mihi ostium verbi), de Sacram. v. 3. 17 - (the order “water, blood, spirit” Snapp transposed order)
http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?Itemid=288&id=710&option=com_content&task=view

 

[Steven Avery]

https://books.google.com/books?id=YnEXAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA111
verse mislabeled in footnotes

Latin

On the Holy Spirit - Book 1 Ch VI 70 -
https://books.google.com/books?id=QSj3SOIttLMC&pg=PA12

On the Holy Spirit - Book 1 Ch VI 73 (says 79-80)
http://books.google.com/books?id=bj3b8aD3XtcC&pg=PA96

On the Holy Spirit - Book 3 III, 2,
http://books.google.com/books?id=zpUXAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA628

Book 3 III, X, 66-67 "quia tres sunt testes, spiritus aqua sanguis" - MANUSCRIPT DIFFERENCES - ONE IN CHRIST JESUS
http://www.monumenta.ch/latein/text...=1&PHPSESSID=8240aa2a677268dd7c390af6b4a300e0

On the Mysteries "quod aqua non mundat sine"

Ambrosius: de Mysteriis

 

[Steven Avery]

There are three or four that have been listed as positive allusions

On the Holy Spirit - Book 1 Ch VI 80 - (like Fulgentius.. Mill needed translated) "deo patre, et christo esse spiritum sanctum cum per ipsum"
http://www.monumenta.ch/latein/text...=1&PHPSESSID=b0dc96877ccf90a0f7318764dbda39a4

In v. 32 "quod unus loquitur, tres loquuntur" - :
http://books.google.com/books?id=V1PYAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA459

These do not differ, but agree together, In the one that speaketh, three speak, for the voice of the Trinity is one
http://books.google.com/books?id=dJwCAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA372

Luke Chapter 21
What one of the divine Persons says, all three say; for the voice of the Trinity is only one
http://haydock1859.tripod.com/id87.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=tbwOAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA313

These three are not at variance, but agree ..because the voice of the Trinity is one [I John 5:7].
http://www.hocna.net/FILIOQUE.pdf

 

[Steven Avery]

● [Commentary on Nahum] But, even the blessed Ambrose reminds us, they are one [Trinity], not with the nature of
the same substance, but to the same of the mystery of operation. For "The Spirit," as the same one says (Lib. III
de Spirit. sanct., cap. 10) "renews the mind, the water is serviceable for the laver, and the blood refers to the
price. For the Spirit makes us sons of God by adoption, the water of the sacred font washes us, the blood of the
Lord redeems us. 'But these three there are that bear witness on earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the
blood.' (1 John 5:8) Another, therefore, is the invisible and another is the visible testimony that we obtain with the
spiritual sacrament." [Ambrose, On the Holy Spirit, Book 3.10; NPN02, vol 10.
<www.newadvent.org/fathers/34023.htm>] (Julian of Toledo, Commentary on Nahum; Translated by Jeroen
Beekhuizen, correspondence, August 2020)

○ Latin: Sed, ut nobis asserit beatus Ambrosius, unum sunt, non natura eiusdem substantiae, sed eiusdem
mysterii operatione. Nam « Spiritus, ut idem ait (Lib. III de Spirit. sanct., cap. 10), mentem revocat, aqua
perficit ad lavacrum, sanguis spectat ad pretium. (0730A) Spiritus per adoptionem nos filios Dei facit,
sacri fontis unda nos abluit, sanguis Domini nos redemit. 'Haec autem sunt tria, quae testimonium
dant in terra, spiritus, aqua, et sanguis’ (I Ioan. V, 8) . Alterum igitur invisibile, alterum visibile
testimonium sacramento consequimur spiritali.» [Ambrosius Mediolanensis, De Spiritu Sancto. Book 3,
chapter 10; Migne Latina, PL 16.792] (Iulianus Toletanus, Commentarius in Nahum; Migne Graeca, PG
96.0730A)

==================================================================


Quoted by Lombard and Bede and Milano ms.