Steven Avery
Administrator
Pure Bible Forum
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...2-vaticanus-sinaiticus-and-alexandrinus.5242/
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...annotationes-on-mark-16-14-freer-logion.4825/
==================================
The Freer-Logion (Mark 16:14): GA 032, Jerome, and Erasmus
https://jbtc.org/v28/TC-2023_BurnetClivaz.pdf
Finally, Erasmus leads us back to the observation of the materiality of the codices them-
selves. First, we noticed that GA 032, the only direct witness so far of the Freer-Logion, presents
at the end of Mark a specific coronis that looks like the final coronis of Codex Vaticanus, Codex
Sinaiticus, and Codex Alexandrinus. This particularity has been noted essentially by Stephen
and reinforces a date of the fifth century for the copy of Mark in W. Erasmus’s considerations
about the coronis to Mark 16:14 also helps us better understand the similar presence of an
added passage in the last chapter of Mark, but in Codex Bobbiensis, which presents an addi-
tion after Mark 16:3, narrating the resurrection of Jesus, witnessed by angels accompanying
him to the heavens. Gregory and Bernard apparently still knew this story, as we hear about it,
thanks to Erasmus’s notice about Mark 16:14 (ll. 146–147, Hovingh’s edition). Let’s bet on the
fact that Erasmus’s commentary on Mark 16:14 still has a lot to teach us.
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...2-vaticanus-sinaiticus-and-alexandrinus.5242/
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...annotationes-on-mark-16-14-freer-logion.4825/
==================================
The Freer-Logion (Mark 16:14): GA 032, Jerome, and Erasmus
https://jbtc.org/v28/TC-2023_BurnetClivaz.pdf
Finally, Erasmus leads us back to the observation of the materiality of the codices them-
selves. First, we noticed that GA 032, the only direct witness so far of the Freer-Logion, presents
at the end of Mark a specific coronis that looks like the final coronis of Codex Vaticanus, Codex
Sinaiticus, and Codex Alexandrinus. This particularity has been noted essentially by Stephen
and reinforces a date of the fifth century for the copy of Mark in W. Erasmus’s considerations
about the coronis to Mark 16:14 also helps us better understand the similar presence of an
added passage in the last chapter of Mark, but in Codex Bobbiensis, which presents an addi-
tion after Mark 16:3, narrating the resurrection of Jesus, witnessed by angels accompanying
him to the heavens. Gregory and Bernard apparently still knew this story, as we hear about it,
thanks to Erasmus’s notice about Mark 16:14 (ll. 146–147, Hovingh’s edition). Let’s bet on the
fact that Erasmus’s commentary on Mark 16:14 still has a lot to teach us.