crucifixion, darkness, earthquake - Africanus - Thallus - Phlegon

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
1755587875296.png


1755587953342.png
 
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
John Gill - Amos

Amos 8 Bible Commentary - John Gill’s Exposition of the Bible | Christianity.com

Study Amos 8 using John Gill’s Exposition of the Bible to better understand Scripture with full outline and verse meaning.
www.christianity.com www.christianity.com

Gerardus Bouw - 2005
http://www.geocentricity.com/ba1/no084/crucifixn.html

Darkness at the crucifixion: metaphor or real history?
By Daniel Anderson
Published 06 Apr, 2007 | Updated 10 Apr, 2020
historical evidence of non-eclipse darkness at Jesus crucifixion
https://creation.com/en/articles/darkness-at-the-crucifixion-metaphor-or-real-history

Beale
Ortlund
http://www.galaxie.com/article/wtj75-2-01?highlight=presuppositions to the interpretive process

Ortlund
2019
http://etsjets.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/files_JETS-PDFs_61_61-3_JETS_61.3_493-511_Ortlund.pdf

Jovinal Thembo
https://scholar.ucu.ac.ug/bitstreams/f563d8be-73e4-49ad-9f5b-8459fb361005/download

reddit - 2016

Facebook - Nick Sayer
https://www.facebook.com/Nickolas.Sayers/posts/10225477561795804

darkness - Luke 23:35 - (1989) Who Was Jesus - a Critique of New Testament Records - (selected sections) - Prof. George Albert Wells
darkness - Luke 23:35 - Arthur Eedle (wrong version) EXC on Phlegon
darkness - Luke 23:35 - Historical Jesus 111:0 and D: Thyalls and Phlegon.First century historians credit darkness at noon.
darkness - Luke 23:35 - Tektonics A Comparison of the work of Glenn Miller and Richard Carrier on Thallus

Philo Ptolemy Aristeas LXX Talmud Megillah 9a - [Messianic_Apologetic] Translation of the Scriptures, Septuagint, darkness upon the world
 
Last edited:
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Peter Streitenberger
https://independent.academia.edu/PeterStreitenberger

https://www.academia.edu/community/activity/J30O8x

FROM OUTER DARKNESS TO EXTREME LIGHT The Three-Hour Darkness of the Crucifixion: A Physical Model and Its Implications for the Authenticity of the Shroud of Turin (2026)
https://www.academia.edu/164940844/...s_for_the_Authenticity_of_the_Shroud_of_Turin

Peter Streitenberger

The three-hour darkness reported during the Crucifixion of Jesus (14 Nisan, 33 AD, 12:00-15:00 Jerusalem local time) is examined as a physical phenomenon using magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) plasma channel theory. We propose a high-energy neutron-driven ionisation front as the mechanism responsible for total light blockade over the Eastern Mediterranean, consistent with the eyewitness accounts of Thallus, Phlegon of Tralles, and Dionysius of Heliopolis. Geodetic measurements (Google Earth) constrain a 14,449 km channel vector extending from the Levant origin (Sakhra, Jerusalem) to a terminal formation in the Scotia Arc region. A rotational braking index of 0.533 ± 0.01, derived from a measured 21° deflection versus the expected 45° Earth rotation over 3 hours, quantifies the mechanical coupling of the plasma channel to the crust. In Part II we apply the derived neutron flux (1.43 × 10¹³ n/cm²) to the radiocarbon dating controversy of the Shroud of Turin. Archaeomagnetic data from GEOMAGIA50 (Shaar 2024, archeo013) establish that the geomagnetic field over the Levant at 33 AD was near its modern value (VADM ≈ 7.25 × 10²² A•m²), ruling out any global field anomaly as the source of the observed radiocarbon anomaly (+12.7 pMC). We demonstrate that the 1988 Oxford/Tucson/Zürich ¹⁴C dating result (689 ± 16 BP → 1260-1390 AD) is physically consistent with a local neutron injection event, and that the mainstream analysis failed to account for this variable. A falsifiable prediction is made: the Shroud should contain Cl-36 at a concentration of approximately 1.2 × 10⁹ atoms/cm³, detectable by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), which has not yet been measured.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top