dealy post lists fake

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
We were objectively investigating the papal claims about Peter's primacy and the keys and we just happened to discover that the list of early popes seems to be semi-fake in that the first 46+ popes positively seem to match the Roman emperors in names/meanings, details, dates/order. I can't post the whole table here, so I will just post some samples here, and the table of the first 46 popes and emperors matches can be seen here http://www.allempires.com/Forum/forum_p ... ?TID=35815 (and/or here http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/ ... ble/page-3 ) (if they don't/haven't deleted it after some trouble). We may possibly have got just a few wrong but it is otherwise pretty certainly right. There is no way this can just be coincidence or wrong. We have not worked out yet what date they first created this list.

"bishop/pope # 15 Zephyrinus 199-217" = emperor # 24 Severus 193/198-211;
"pope/bishop # 16 Callistus/Cal(l)ixtus 217-222" = emperor # 25 Caracalla 198/211-217.
"# 16-19 Antipope Hippolytus 217-236" = emperor # 28 Heliogabalus 218-222.

I am still working on even better evidences and presentation, but had to post this now just in case they cut off my net/etc.

======


Post by Japhethite » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:38 am
The other two forums that we first posted this on are having strange troubles. So here are all the alternate links to our Popes/Emperors table and some more info:

http://www.worldhistoria.com/topic12925 ... html#98218
http://www.freewebs.com/lifetradition/theempire.htm
http://www.allempires.com/Forum/forum_p ... ?TID=35815
http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/ ... ble/page-3
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1930
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top