Facundus - error in Cyprian book title - feminine persona confusion

Steven Avery

Administrator
• [Travis] Let it be first remarked, as to this testimony of Facundus, that he probably never saw the Treatise of Cyprian to which he thus refers. He seems to have been utterly at a loss even how to describe, or class it: for he calls it an epistle, or a book. And he has indubitably given to it a title which is not its own. ”In letter or book on the Trinity” (Latin: In Epistola sive libro de Trinitate), says Facundus, instead of ”On the unity of the Church” (Latin: de Unitate ecclesiae), which is its real title.

(Travis, Letters to Edward Gibbon, 1794, 3rd edition, p. 108)
https://books.google.com/books?id=nf0qAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA108


1631838270580.png

1631838402708.png


• [Armfield] ... the inaccuracy of Facundus in referring to the "de Unitate Ecclesiae" as "Epistola sive Liber quem de Trinitate scripsit;" and indeed the very expression, "quem de Trinitate scripsit," compared with Fulgentius "Epistola de Unitate Ecclesiae," gives to his testimony the greater weight which is due to one who, it would seem, was so familiar with the name and writings of St. Cyprian.

”On the Unity of the Church”
”Letter or Book on the Trinity”
”who wrote on the Trinity”
'“Letter on the Unity of the Church”


1631838605486.png


(Armfield, The Three Witnesses The Disputed Text in St. John, 1883, p. 83-84)
www.archive.org/stream/threewitnessesdi00armf#page/82/mode/2up
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Quod tamen Ioannis apostoli testimonium beatus Cyprianus Carthaginiensis antistes et martyr in epistola sive libro quem de Trinitate scripsit, de Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto dictum intelligit. Ait enim (tom. II) : « Dicit Dominus, Ego et Pater unum sumus (Ioan. X, 30) ; et iterum de Patre et Filio et Spiritu sancto scriptum est, et hi tres unum sunt (I Ioan. V, 7) . »

http://www.mlat.uzh.ch/MLS/xfromcc.php?tabelle=Facundus_Hermianensis_cps2&rumpfid=Facundus_Hermianensis_cps2, Pro defensione trium capitulorum, 1, 3&id=Facundus_Hermianensis_cps2, Pro defensione trium capitulorum, 1, 3&level=&corpus=2&current_title=LIBER PRIMUS.
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
https://forums.carm.org/threads/thomas-golda-extensive-research-on-1-john-5-7.5539/post-418651

Before Travis and Armfield, John Ernest Grabe (1666–1711) showed the difficulties of Facundus.

And a little after he savs; “This passage of the apostle John the blessed Cyprian, bishop of Carthage and martyr, in an epistle, or book, which he wrote concerning the Trinity ... From which epistle he (Fulgentius) quotes the words of St. Cyprian, and that more correctly than Facundus, who was certainly mistaken, when he quoted a book or epistle [of Cyprian’s] on the Trinity.

Defensio Fidei Nicænæ: A Defense of the Nicene Creed, Out of the Extant Writings of the Catholick Doctors, who Flourished During the Three First Centuries of the Christian Church ; in which Also is Incidentally Vindicated the Creed of Constantinople ; Concerning the Holy Ghost (1852)
George Bull
Appendix - Grabe's Notes
https://books.google.com/books?id=WJ8PAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA714

Travis likely knew of the Grabe section.
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Here is where Facundus, in the midst of his speculative confusions, does not even have the name of the Cyprian book right.

Facundus

First Book. (PL 67 0534C), Chapter 3. Which one of the Trinity suffered

13. Unless, perhaps, when he says: "There are three who testify on earth - the spirit, the water and the blood - and these three are one," those who strive for a word do not want not understand that it is a question of the Trinity which is one God and that they answer in place of the apostle John, from the very words he used: "These three who bear witness," they say, "on earth and who are one, can we call them spirits, waters or bloods?" Blessed Cyprian, bishop of Carthage and martyr, also understands in the letter or the book he wrote "On the Trinity" that this testimony of the apostle John designates the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, because he says : "The Lord says, 'The Father and I are one' and again: of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit it is written: 'And the three are one.'"
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Feminine personal confusion

12. What, then, is their response on behalf of John the Apostle? What are these three of masculine gender that
are said to give testimony on earth and that are said to be one? Are they gods? Fathers? Sons or Holy Spirits?
Certainly not, but these three are the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, even though no single masculine noun
(in Latin) can apply to every one of them in the same way as the feminine noun “persona” (person) does.
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Duplication in WItness

FIRST BOOK. (PL 67 0534C), Chapter 3. Which one of the Trinity suffered.
1-24
9. In fact the apostle John also, in his letter speaks thus of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit:
"There are three who bear witness on earth - the spirit, the water and the blood - and these three are one,”
By "the spirit," he means the Father, as the Lord did when he said to the Samaritan woman, according to the
Gospel of the same Saint John: "Believe me, the hour will come when it will not be in this mountain, nor in
Jerusalem that you will worship the Father. You worship what you do not know, we worship what we know, for
salvation comes from the Jews. But the hour comes, and it is now, where the true worshipers will worship the
Father in spirit and in truth. Such, in fact, are the worshipers whom the Father desires. God is spirit, and those
who worship him should worship him in spirit and in truth."


10. By "water," he means the Holy Spirit, as when he reveals in his same Gospel the words of the Lord who says:
"If anyone is thirsty, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the scripture says, rivers of living
water will flow from his bosom." He adds immediately after: "Now he said these words concerning the Spirit which
those were to receive who would believe in him, for the Spirit was not yet given, since Jesus had not yet been
glorified," and

by "blood" he means the Son, since it is he of the Holy Trinity who participated in flesh and blood.
So the apostle John when he speaks of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit does not say: "There are
three persons who testify on earth - the spirit, the water and the blood - and these three persons are one”,
but rather he says:“There are three that bear witness on earth - the spirit, the water and the blood - and
these three are one”.

23. However, looking closely at the problem and looking deeper into the cause, it would appear that we do not say
"one" for "one person", but rather "one person" for "one of the Trinity". In fact, the Church of Christ (even when
the name "of persons" was not yet used to distinguish Father, Son and Holy Spirit) has always believed
and preached three, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as we have shown before with the testimony of the
apostle John, where it says: "There are three who bear witness on earth, spirit, water and blood, and
these three are one."

 24. However the name "person" was not assumed in the use of preaching except out of necessity when Sabellius
began to fight against the Church, for which those in whom it has always been believed and who have been
called three, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. They are now called together with the one and common name of
"persons". Then "subsistences" were also said, as pleased the Church, to indicate the Trinity and to attribute this
name to the distinction of persons. And so it was that one day the question arose about this new vocabulary: is it
necessary, in order to express the Trinity which is God, to admit "person" and "subsistence", as the very term of
"Trinity" has also been admitted? But it has never disputed what the Church has always held firm and
preached, namely that there are three who bear witness on earth and "these three are one".


5. Greek Fathers Quote Leo's Tome
a. Facundus (fluent in Greek) : Quotes verse 8 with”in earth"
 Which one of the Trinity suffered (Defense of the Three Chapters, Book 1, Chapter 3).

 9. In fact, the apostle John also in his letter writes about the Father, the Son and the Holy
Spirit:”There are three who testify on earth, spirit, water and blood and these three are one”(1 Jn
5, 8). With”spirit”it indicates the Father, as does the Lord, who in the Gospel of John himself says to the
Samaritan woman:”Jesus saith to her: Woman, believe me that the hour cometh, when you shall neither
on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, adore the Father. You adore that which you know not: we adore that
which we know. For salvation is of the Jews. But the hour cometh and now is, when the true adorers shall
adore the Father in spirit and in truth. For the Father also seeketh such to adore him. God is a spirit: and
they that adore him must adore him in spirit and in truth."(Jn 4: 21-24).

 11. By”blood”instead it indicates the Son, since he was part of the flesh and blood of the Holy Trinity. So
the apostle John speaking of Father, Son and Holy Spirit does not say that there are three
‘persons’ who testify on earth, that is spirit, water and blood, and that these three are one, but
rather says:”There are three who testify on earth, spirit, water and blood and these three are
one.”(I Jn v. 8)

 23. However, by carefully examining the problem and looking more deeply into the cause, it would
emerge that we do not say”one”for”one person", but rather one says”one person”for”one of the Trinity". In
fact, the Church of Christ, even when the name of persons was not yet used to distinguish Father,
Son and Holy Spirit, has always believed and preached three, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as we
have shown before with the testimony of the apostle John where it says:”Three are who testify on
earth, spirit, water and blood, and these three are one.”(1 Jn 5: 8)

 24. However the name of person was not assumed in the use of preaching except out of necessity when
Sabellio began to fight against the Church, so those in whom it has always been believed and who have
been called [PAGE 71] three (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) are now called together with the common
name of”person”. Then subsistences were also said, as the Church liked, to indicate the Trinity and to
attribute this name to the distinction of”persons”. Once upon a time there was a discussion about the new
name of”person”or of”subsistence”, if it were to be admitted to indicate the Trinity which is God, as the
name of Trinity itself was also admitted; but there was never any discussion about what the Church
has always held firm and preached, namely that there are three who bear witness on earth
and”these three are one."
 
Top