John J. Brogan on Sinaiticus corrections and Athanasius

Steven Avery

Administrator
Amy Myshrall

Amy Myshrall
1674525060472.png


1674525221468.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
1674525880474.png


John Brogan is intrigued with the presence in Sinaiticus of what is called 1
block mixture 1 in the text of John's Gospel. Instead of Hort's view that the text
of Sinaiticus in the Fourth Gospel is primarily Alexandrian with Western ...
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
1675961613063.png

1675961746035.png


1675961825384.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
The Mission of the Jerusalem Apostles: An Authorial, Historical and Canonical Reconstruction
hky hu
https://independent.academia.edu/hkyhui

https://www.academia.edu/74553756/T...orial_Historical_and_Canonical_Reconstruction



Scholars believe that there is a close connection between the canonical list of Athanasius and the formation of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. 51

51 For example, Birdsall, “The Codex Vaticanus: Its History and Significance,” 33, believes that the date of the Festal Letter gives us a marker for the period within which Codex Vaticanus might have been produced; and Brogan, “Another Look at Codex Sinaiticus,” 20-25, speculates that Origen and Didymus the Blind had access to, and even made corrections to, the proto-Sinaiticus text. It is also suggested that Athanasius had connection to Codex Sinaiticus because of his close textual affinity to the correction of Sinaiticus. During Athanasius’ lifetime, Codex Sinaiticus was most likely transcribed. Athanasius is the earliest witness of a reading that appears in later biblical manuscripts and/or
the corrections of Sinaiticus.
 
Last edited:
Top