Pericope Adulterae - Augustine and Ambrose explain tendency for scribes to omit the passage

Steven Avery

Administrator
Ambrose (338-397 AD) :
Ambrose is reputed to cite the pericope several times, e.g. Epistle 25,7, Epistle 26,2: http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/TCG/TC-John-PA.pdf.

‘At the same time also the Gospel which has been covered, could produce extraordinary anxiety in the inexperienced, in which you have noticed an adulterous presented to Christ and also dismissed without condemnation … How indeed could Christ err? It is not right that this should come into our mind’: Ambrose (ca 397), ‘Apologia David altera’ (1.1, 3), in Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol. 32: S. Ambrosii Opera, Part 2, ed. Carolus Schenkl (Vindobonae: F. Tempsky, 1887), pp 359-60 cited at
http://textualcriticism.scienceontheweb.net/TEXT/Hodges1979.html#f49b.

Augustine (354-430 AD):
‘Certain persons of little faith, or rather enemies of the true faith, fearing, I suppose, lest their wives should be given impunity in sinning, removed from their manuscripts the Lord's act of forgiveness toward the adulteress, as if he who had said, Sin no more, had granted permission to sin.’: Augustine, De Adulterinis Conjugiis 2:6–7:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_and_the_woman_taken_in_adultery#cite_note-14.

 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Above, Hefin Jones above ries to justify Knust and Wasserman discounting Ambrose and Augustine.

To Cast the First Stone: The Transmission of a Gospel Story (2020)
Knust and Wasserman
https://books.google.com/books?id=Q5mzDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA218

p. 218

=========================


 
Last edited:
Top