reddit - all cause mortality

Steven Avery

Administrator
vaccine trials - all cause mortality
renderTimingPixel.png

reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/mfdexs
One simple question. Will any vax or gene technology trials or studies give you their all cause mortality (ACM) numbers? Only interested in control groups that are saline placebo, or no vax at all. Not interested if a different vax Is the control.

Some trials are 40k (20k +20K presumably) people. With 20k generally above-average healthy people (e.g. nobody very old, or in hospitals or morbidities, no infants) in 3 months you would expect under 20 deaths, compared to 40 for the full population including those on the bubble. (Yes, auto accidents deaths can be adjusted and not included in ACM.) And yes, the figure can be tweaked.

So in 3 months of a trial, can we know the ACM? Then 6 months, etc, since the trials are c. 2 years. Or is that number hidden from view by various adjustments or the designed methodology?

Thanks!
Steven Avery
Dutchess County, NY
 

Steven Avery

Administrator

Please fix the headline, this is not "during February". Also wrong in the audio and the lines under the audio. This is deaths in a limited 28-day period after vax in about a 4 month period. It would be interesting to FOI other numbers like the 60 day period.

=====================

Thank you for your efforts here!

These are incredibly high numbers for about 1.3 million jabs, almost all simply first jab.

BBC - Feb 17
Covid in Scotland: How many people have been vaccinated?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-55928563

Counting per jab, not tweaking for first or second jab, If this ratio extrapolated to the US population you would have about 1,000,000 deaths in that one month period after jabs! Approximately 600,000,000 jabs would be planned (although really many will resist), which is a herd 460 times greater than the 1.3 million so far in Scotland. 460 x 2,200 takes you over a million deaths. Normally the USA has over 300,000 deaths per year, so in any seven-week period (21 days between jabs and then 28) the normal deaths would be 40,000. The bottom line, the jabs are pharma-$ murder incorporated. There is no way to account for these huge numbers by normal health mortality.

The numbers are so astronomically high that this is a textbook case of correlation impels contribution and causation.

Feel free to tweak my numbers, in any substantive way. (One tweak depends on whether the early jabbers are relatively healthy or relatively fragile.) If I am wrong in any significant way, I will be most happy to be corrected. One thing, clearly there could have been various blunders unique to Scotland which would drive extra carnage.

If you wonder why this was not caught in the trials, I have been wondering about the trial trail. Please see my posts on reddit, studying the tricky 28 day "evidence of infection" exclusion from the Pfizer trials.

reddit
vaccine trials - all cause mortality
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/mfdexs
Thanks for reading!

Steven Avery
Dutchess County, NY, USA
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/steven.avery.7568/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY/
 

Steven Avery

Administrator

Steven Avery

Administrator
2021 - new

false dichotomy - the pro-jab fallacy
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/q533hy/_/hg4lkuo
The All Cause Mortality was discussed a bit here:

Vaccine Trials - All Cause Mortality
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/mfdexs
If the PCR tests didn’t work, then how the hell do they know if we had a pandemic or not?
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/orrrvw/_/h6l83nn See my post
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateVaccines/comments/orrrvw/_/h6k56iq
2021-08-06 ::: Analysis of all-cause mortality by week in Canada 2010-2021, by province, age and sex: There was no COVID-19 pandemic, and there is strong evidence of response-caused deaths in the most elderly and in young males

Denis Rancourt

This lists his conclusions to date and links to studies. Note that Denis Rancourt does seem to believe that there is a "virus" as defined in the "scientific" community. However, he considers "terrain" as more important.

All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response
Denis G. Rancourt

Denis Rancourt - Sept. 19.2020 530 am ET
https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY/status/1307805233620320256?s=20
You know the propaganda has been over-the-top when the @WSJ
starts to scale it back.
Death Toll From Covid-19 Pandemic Extends Far Beyond Virus Victims
Doctors and researchers say more Americans are dying from heart
attacks and other health issues; drop in ER visits, health screenings
ByJon Kamp

Have 400,000 Americans Died of Covid-19?
Celia Farber - Jan 25, 2021

Facebook discussion - Zara, Denis, myself, others
https://www.facebook.com/beatrix.lovett/posts/3163959980382793

Facebook - BrightLight News

James DeMeo found anomalies in CDC stats, dunno if ever explained

Lockdowns cause mortality spike, not Covid-19
2020 discussion - Simin Williams article

Twitter
https://twitter.com/Humble_Analysis/status/1311766609967550464
Steven Avery @StevenAveryNY Oct 1, 2020
Replying to @Humble_Analysis
All cause mortality is the only solid figure, hard to manipulate. Are spikes really other causes? Iatrogenic (e.g. ventilator murder machines) unhealthy hospital treatment, even wrong ailment. In some cases 5G or massive high-dose flu vaccines. See Denis Rancourt paper. Thoughts?

Never a Pandemic Denis Rancourt paper, plus today’s Off-Guardian, any comments?
Comments Discussion

Ironically, Denis Rancourt is defending elements of virus theory here:

Denis Rancourt on Bitchute interview
 
Top