Romans 9:5 - Erasmus and Beza

Steven Avery

Administrator
Some is in Chrysostom .. bringing Lu Ann Homza here.



Lu Ann Homza discusses Valladolid on p. 93 and 113 - excellent!
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3039329?seq=16#metadata_info_tab_contents

1638287721245.png

1638287774398.png

1638287836992.png


p. 113
1638287939166.png

1638287986216.png


100, Grafton, 1991, 36-44
1638288092083.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Jan Krans on Beza (after five pages on Erasmus)

===========================================

Beyond What Is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament - (2006)
Jan Krans
https://archive.org/details/BeyondW...ConjecturalCriticsOfTheNew/page/n129/mode/1up
1639815607335.png


===========================================

Brian has Beza on Romans 9:5 translated as:

"For it was proper that the Deity of Christ also be explained, so that it might appear what excellence of the Israelite nation is in him, that Christ was born of it. That is, that He is both man and God, and not merely because he was the most excellent of all m

===========================================

Also discussed on Reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/grammar/comments/rew8p1/comma_god_blessed_blessed_by_god/

===========================================
 
Top