the collection of conjectural absurdities by textual scholars to "explain" the colour tampering disparity

Steven Avery

Administrator
The attempts are amazing.

James Snapp
Elijah Hixson
Jacob Peterson
British Library

On this thread we will plan on coalescing the earlier attempts and adding new material

the conservation and storage games of the Sinaiticus darkening deniers
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.268

the colour photography games of the Sinaiticus darkening deniers
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.267

James Snapp on colour disparity - "As far as I can tell, they do not vary in color"
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.594

James Snapp attempts to defend authenticity of Sinaiticus
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.468

there must be another explanation for the colour and staining anomalies of the 1844 and 1859 Sinaiticus sections
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.527

why the Sinaiticus and textual and manuscript scholars do not want to touch the real issues
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.487

responses from those involved in textual criticism
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.239

British Library - and other - modern comments on research and condition and colour
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.191

reasons, excuses, confusions - circularity
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.197

Some, like Tommy Wasserman, just dance away from the question.

Note: I am not including the ones about the "phenomenally good condition", the easy-peasy page turning suppleness.

===================

Plus these threads could all be put in one sub-forum.

===================
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
analysis threads

be sure to visit www.sinaiticus.net !
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.257!

are the Leipzig CFA 43 leaves white parchment?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.253

Is the ink placed over the yellow ms. or does the ms. yellow naturally after the ink?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.188


the colouring of Codex Simoneidos is one of the most amazing evidences of ms tampering or forgery that has ever been seen
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.542

why the colour and condition of Sinaiticus points to inauthenticity
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.196

the early 1860s references to the colouring of the manuscript
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.490

can photography anomalies account for the 1844 CFA white vs the 1859 yellow ?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.525

discoloration of documents, stains, liquids used - forensic testing
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.109

when in the 1850s was the Sinaiticus ms coloured?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.515

If the 1859 St. Petersburg manuscript is artifically coloured, can it still be ancient and authentic ?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.513

why do we know that the 1859 CSP leaves were artificially coloured?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.230

Tischendorf would have preferred to have one consistent colour manuscript
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.493

"the colour ... wholly different from that invariably found on genuine documents of the same professed age and character"
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.475

coincidences abound!
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.399!

red flags of forgery
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.296

Sinaiticus ms accepted as unbound and trimmed after 1844. Why not other tampering? colouring, Arabic notes, et
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.292

when did Tischendorf first publicly connect the 1844 CFA to the 1859 Sinaiticus?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.147

The Tale of Two Manuscripts
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.201

academics can't handle simplicity
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.247

"over 150 years of scholarly research on this ancient codex"
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.250

what is the smoking gun?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.246

CSP image specialist skills
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.244

CSP encouragements to ongoing study
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.243

Tischendorf descriptions show awareness of CFA-CSP colour anomaly
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.229

white parchment
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.82

no testing of materials of ink! .. oops
[URL="https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.86[/URL]

notes on the condition of ancient parchment mss
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.192

manuscript photo gallery
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.111

no colour photos available until CSP 2009
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.145

physical reexamination
four types
 
Last edited:
Top