Thomas Smith - example of his shredding Sandius 'lame' arguments - Father as a witness

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Grantley McDonald falsely and rather viciously tries to attack the superb writing of Thomas Smith in many places. Here is one where he simply gives the Sandius argument and does not give the Thomas Smith response.

Grantley McDonald
RGA - p. 196
He also dismisses Sandius’ objection that the comma makes no sense because it would be unworthy for God to stand as a witness. (“Before what judge,” Sandius had asked, “might God stand as a witness?”)
Click to expand...

While Grantley made the analysis of Thomas Smith difficult by missing totally his English edition, we have his response here:

Sermon of the credibility of the mysteries
https://books.google.com/books?id=na5oAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA73

1618742720771.png

1618742870276.png


This shredding is also in the 1690 Latin on p. 149, but Grantley did not tell that to the readers.
https://books.google.com/books?id=0g5AAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA149
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top