Steven Avery
Administrator
Auxiliary info:
==============================
support for the basic Daniel Wallace argument that Spirit is not grammatically personalized in the New Testament
Facebook - PureBible
https://www.facebook.com/groups/purebible/permalink/1906435479448332/
Pure Bible Forum - sister threads
Daniel Wallace makes constructio ad sensum theory out of CT corruptions, often ultra-minority
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.71
support for the basic Daniel Wallace argument that Spirit is not grammatically personalized in the New Testament
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.308
constructio ad sensum
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.70/post-181
Acts 13:2 - do personal attributes make the Holy Spirit a "person"
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1007/post-2236
blunder by Doug Kutilek on masculine grammar, supposed constructio ad sensum
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1027
==============================
support for the basic Daniel Wallace argument that Spirit is not grammatically personalized in the New Testament
The whole section is a good read.Confessions of a member of the church of England occasioned by a laborious examination of the work of William Jones: "The Catholic Doctrine of a Trinity" (1830)
John Shaw
https://books.google.com/books?id=ubFNAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA84
"Now it will be found, upon a careful examination of the three chapters I have mentioned, that in every instance where the masculine article and pronoun are used, the Paraclete is either the expressed or obviously implied antecedent."
Last edited: