does Brent Nongbri accept the ms 1739 colophon reference to Origen as authentic?

Steven Avery

Administrator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minuscule_1739

Bob Waltz
http://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/Manuscripts1501-2000.html#m1739

Brent Nongbri (2020)
https://brentnongbri.com/2020/06/06/a-question-about-the-initial-text-of-new-testament-documents/
A Question About the “Initial Text” of New Testament Documents

although I guess the earliest surviving immaterial text might be considered 1739, perhaps pushing things back to the time of Origen.

...

At an intuitive level, I somehow want the age of the manuscripts (or even the age of the text, as in the case of 1739) to have some kind of role in the process.
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
1722808457194.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
The Textual History of the Letter to the Romans: A Study in Textual and Literary Criticism, Issues 42-43 (1977)
Harry Y. Gamble
1722811816885.png

1722811946525.png
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Metzger
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Introducing Romans: Critical Issues in Paul's Most Famous Letter (2011)
Richard N. Longenecker
 
Top