Steven Avery
Administrator
Basically, Kevin is wrong on every point 
.
A Review of 'The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus' by Dr W.R. Cooper against detailed background of the discovery of the Codex
Cooper - 2018 p. 12
Among such in recent years we can mention David W. Daniels, who produced a book Is the ‘World’s Oldest Bible’ a Fake?, Chris Pinto, who produced a video Tares among the Wheat, which includes details about Codex Sinaiticus, and the many blog posts by ‘Steven Avery’ (= Steven Avery Spencer). These are deeply flawed and unbalanced, and to a greater or lesser extent they utilize the methods of conspiracy theory. Many of the arguments that these writers consider to be most compelling (among themselves) are based on gross misunderstandings of the evidence, and a complete failure to deal with, and in many cases even acknowledge, countervailing evidence. In so doing they are doing great disservice to the causes they claim to espouse.
p. 110
predisposed with considerable confirmation bias to accept the theory dangled in front of him by Steven Spencer (‘Steven Avery’) from 2014 based on the falsehoods of the compulsive liar Constantine Simonides, reinforced by images of the Leipzig leaves in false colour
p, 118
This is also a major thrust of bloggers such as ‘Steven Avery’ (= Steven Avery Spencer), who make the same fundamental mistake. Fortunately ‘Steven Avery’ has come to realize that Uspensky saw the ‘white parchment’ leaves at Mount Sinai in 1850 as well as 1845, so he has had to tailor his account to make the distressing start after 1850.
.A Review of 'The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus' by Dr W.R. Cooper against detailed background of the discovery of the Codex
A Review of 'The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus' by Dr W.R. Cooper against detailed background of the discovery of the Codex
A critical review of Dr W.R. Cooper’s thesis in his book ‘The Forging of Codex Sinaiticus‘. The review demonstrates that Dr Cooper’s thesis that Codex Sinaiticus was produced in the nineteenth century is a classic conspiracy theory, and without
www.academia.edu
Cooper - 2018 p. 12
Among such in recent years we can mention David W. Daniels, who produced a book Is the ‘World’s Oldest Bible’ a Fake?, Chris Pinto, who produced a video Tares among the Wheat, which includes details about Codex Sinaiticus, and the many blog posts by ‘Steven Avery’ (= Steven Avery Spencer). These are deeply flawed and unbalanced, and to a greater or lesser extent they utilize the methods of conspiracy theory. Many of the arguments that these writers consider to be most compelling (among themselves) are based on gross misunderstandings of the evidence, and a complete failure to deal with, and in many cases even acknowledge, countervailing evidence. In so doing they are doing great disservice to the causes they claim to espouse.
p. 110
predisposed with considerable confirmation bias to accept the theory dangled in front of him by Steven Spencer (‘Steven Avery’) from 2014 based on the falsehoods of the compulsive liar Constantine Simonides, reinforced by images of the Leipzig leaves in false colour
p, 118
This is also a major thrust of bloggers such as ‘Steven Avery’ (= Steven Avery Spencer), who make the same fundamental mistake. Fortunately ‘Steven Avery’ has come to realize that Uspensky saw the ‘white parchment’ leaves at Mount Sinai in 1850 as well as 1845, so he has had to tailor his account to make the distressing start after 1850.