Steven Avery
Administrator
CARM
pl. 46
p. 52
Nope, this is Coislinianus
Those who are sceptical on these points can refer to pages 277 and 309 of the Greek Palaeography of the celebrated Montphocon,—
Bibliotheca bibliothecarum manuscriptorum nova: Tomus primus - Bernard de Montfaucon
https://books.google.com/books?id=Ej5oSHr50PEC&pg=PA151
https://books.google.com/books?id=qmNoAAAAcAAJ&pg=PR253-IA2
WRONG
p. 277
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5319074149&view=1up&seq=315
p. 309
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5319074149&view=1up&seq=347
p. 52
p. 53
In the next place, M. Rhancabcs asserts that it is physically impossible for manuscripts to last through so many ages.
p. 58
p. 60
pl. 46
p. 52
Nope, this is Coislinianus
Those who are sceptical on these points can refer to pages 277 and 309 of the Greek Palaeography of the celebrated Montphocon,—
Bibliotheca bibliothecarum manuscriptorum nova: Tomus primus - Bernard de Montfaucon
https://books.google.com/books?id=Ej5oSHr50PEC&pg=PA151
https://books.google.com/books?id=qmNoAAAAcAAJ&pg=PR253-IA2
WRONG
p. 277
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5319074149&view=1up&seq=315
p. 309
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5319074149&view=1up&seq=347
p. 52
p. 53
In the next place, M. Rhancabcs asserts that it is physically impossible for manuscripts to last through so many ages.
p. 58
p. 60
Attachments
Last edited: