the Barnabas Latin element - Donaldson - more pronounced in the first five chapters?

[Steven Avery]

the Barnabas Latin element - Donaldson - more pronounced in the first five chapters?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...e-pronounced-in-the-first-five-chapters.3115/

the James Donaldson linguistic argument that Barnabas and Hermas are not 4th century

Currently on the BCHF forum.

www.purebibleforum.com

Barnabas after Donaldson - true Greek of Codex Hierosolymitanus from Bryennios compared to latinized Sinaiticus

Hermas and Barnabas projects - Athous compared to Sinaiticus New Finds - Latinized words from Donaldson in papyri and mss - bibliography https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/hermas-and-barnabas-projects-athous-compared-to-sinaiticus-latinized-word-from-donaldson-in-papyri.2818/...

www.purebibleforum.com

Barnabas after Donaldson - true Greek of Codex Hierosolymitanus from Bryennios compared to latinized Sinaiticus
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/barnabas-after-donaldson-true-greek-of-codex-

Barnabas - G has the same text as the 7th century corrector of S - CSP urls
https://purebibleforum.com/index.ph...tury-corrector-of-s-csp-urls.2894/#post-12173
Does Sinaiticus 7th century corrector that matches G begin at the first chapter or the fifth?
Does the main text in the first five chapters of Sinaiticus have an affiliation with G?

Barnabas - the major corrections - correlation with G (e.g. Codex Ottobonianus 348) which effected printed editions
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...nus-348-which-effected-printed-editions.4733/

Maximo in Hermas Visions II:3,4 - from Tischendorf to James Donaldson to David Daniels
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...ldson-to-david-daniels.2851/page-2#post-12016
Possible emendation sources as discussed by Donaldson
The letter of Barnabas was subsequently edited by Mader (Helmstadt 1655), and in the collections of Cotelerius, Russel, Gallandi, Hefele, Reithmayr, and Muralto. It was published separately by Fell (Oxford 1685, i2mo.), and by Le Moyne in his Varia Sacra.
Dressel has examined all the manuscripts to which he

 

[Steven Avery]

Let us take the scenario where Simonides did his Barnabas in the 1860s rather than the 1840s.
(If Simonides did Barnabas in the 1840s, it is proof, but then where are the six manuscripts? and the provenance ... not mentioned till the 1860s ? We should look closely at the introduction.)

================================================

Then the question is looking at both scenarios.

1) Sinaiticus as ancient
The Barnabas in Sinaiticus should then be very close to the later found Greek papyri fragments.
There should not be Latinized elements. (The James Donaldson study.)

2) Sinaiticus as 1800s
The Sinaiticus Barnabas likely had to be taken from the Latin.
There will be significant differences from the later papyri.
There will be Latinized elements.

 

[Steven Avery]

Codex Hierosolymitanus (also called the Bryennios manuscript or the Jerusalem Codex, often designated simply "H" in scholarly discourse) is an 11th-century Greek manuscript, written by an otherwise unknown scribe named Leo, who dated it 1056. Its designation of "Jerusalem" recalls its resting place in Jerusalem, at the library of the monastery of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Hierosolymitanus

 

[Steven Avery]

four words in Greek in the optative discussion (Hermas)

 

[Steven Avery]

PICS

Any big corrections in first 5 chapters?

Codex Sinaiticus - See The Manuscript | Barnabas |

Codex Sinaiticus is one of the most important books in the world. Handwritten well over 1600 years ago, the manuscript contains the Christian Bible in Greek, including the oldest complete copy of the New Testament. The Codex Sinaiticus Project is an international collaboration to reunite the...

codexsinaiticus.org

3 leaves

Leaf 3 top of 3rd col