accusations of forgery against Bryennios with Codex Hierosolymitanus - Didache, Epistle of Barnabas, 1 & 2 Clement, Ignatius, Chrysostom list

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
So far the only hint in the early years is James Donaldson, although the scholars today say there was more.
Add The Critic article, down below.

Originally info was placed here.
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...ared-to-latinized-sinaiticus.1077/#post-14232

before 1844 - poof provenance ( Georgi Parpulov confirms 1734 catalog by Nikephoros Marthalis Glykos ) - Donati est aussi vague - Cyrillos Kapustin?

In this thread we will begin to collate the materials relating to the lack of any references to the Codex until it became a major find in the 1840s by Tischendorf and Uspensky. Ancient Catalog Facebook - Sinaiticus Forum - Dec 31, 2013 Steven Avery...
www.purebibleforum.com
 
Last edited:
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
James Donaldson (1877)
https://books.google.com/books?id=W0EEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA36
p. 36-37
We have given nearly all the information in regard to this
manuscript which Bryennius has vouchsafed to impart to us.
He does not say anything of the history of the Library or of
the manuscript. He supplies us with no external testimony
to its antiquity. He mentions the fact that he was aided in
the collation by his illustrious friend, the Metropolitan of
Korytzas, Dorotheus Evelpis. We have to trust entirely to the
honour of these two Greek clergymen for the fact that a really
genuine manuscript has been found, and to internal evidence.
We cannot think that this is an entirely satisfactory method
of procedure. When a manuscript is discovered, all the exter-
nal testimony that can be adduced should be adduced. In
this particular case we are met with a puzzling circumstance.
Gebhardt and Harnack state that a catalogue of this Library
was prepared by Bethmann in 1815, and exists in Pertz’s
Archiv, but no mention is made of our Codex. Was it in the
Library then ? Still more unsatisfactory is the absence of
such external testimony when so important a Codex as the
Sinaiticus is concerned.

Aaron Milovec
http://books.google.com/books?id=17v6sT1l-aYC&pg=PA5
for accusations see Hitchcock and Brown 1884 first Englis, v - authenticity prevailed

the teachings of the 12 apostles
Roswell Dwight Hitchcock
Francis Brown
https://search.worldcat.org/title/2497424
Vassar College
books.google.com

Didachē Tōn Dōdeka Apostolōu

books.google.com

PIC

‘also discusses Krawutzcky

Dennis Clark follows Milovec
https://books.google.com/books?id=8SzyDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT19

Aaron Milovec
books.google.com

The Didache

Most Christians believe that everything about Jesus and the early church can be found in their New Testament. In recent years, however, the discovery of the Gospel of Thomas and the reconstruction of the Q-Gospel have led scholars to recognize that some very early materials were left out. Now...
books.google.com
 
Last edited:
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Chares M. Hoole
https://books.google.com/books?id=THEGGFe-vskC&pg=PT20
The Didache (Annotated Edition) (2012)

It contains, besides the first and second Epistles of Clement, a complete text of the longer recension of Ignatius, "The Epistle of Barnabas," "The Synopsis of St. Chrysostom," and "The Teaching of the Apostles," which comes between the Clement and Ignatius.
After a good deal of consideration, I have come to the conclusion that the Didache is not an original work, but a compilation or series of excerpts from the treatises already quoted. Any one who will compare the Didache of Bryennius with the passages taken from Barnabas, Hermas, the Judicium Petri, and the Apostolic Constitutions, will find it difficult to avoid the conclusion that the author of the Didache had these works in his hands, and compiled from them what he supposed to be the primitive doctrine of the Apostles; and the position of his work is not that of an original to an enlarged and completed copy, but that of a condensation and compilation from a number of other works. There seems some reason

and that the Didache discovered by Bryennius, which was no doubt the
same as that mentioned by Nicephorus in the ninth century, was a

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikephoros_I_of_Constantinople
 
Last edited:
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
concerns raised - could not photograph
1729263342825.png


Francis Brown responds right above

The Critic
https://books.google.com/books?id=MFjGdtp8KFwC&pg=RA1-PA67
”utterly groundless attack”
1729263440721.png


=========

books.google.com

The Daily Discoveries of a Bible Scholar and Manuscript Hunter: A Biography of James Rendel Harris (1852–1941)

This is the first full biography of James Rendel Harris (1852-1941), Bible and patristic scholar, manuscript collector, Quaker theologian, devotional writer, traveller, folklorist, and relief worker. Drawing on published and unpublished sources gathered in the United States, Europe, and the...
books.google.com
 
Last edited:
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Moses Wilhelm Shapira’s Forgotten Scroll of Jeremiah
By Matthew Hamilton1
26 November 2023
https://www.academia.edu/109819157/Moses_Wilhelm_Shapiras_Forgotten_Scroll_of_Jeremiah

1 Independent researcher, Sydney, Australia. Thanks are given to Chris Phillips, English genealogist, for making available his extensive research into Colonel Campbell, the last known owner of the scroll of Jeremiah.

1869:

Durch einen Geschäftsfreund im Orient erhielt ich im vorigen Jahre zwei alterthümliche Thora-Rollen, aus Arabien und Palästina stammend, die sowohl wegen ihres hohen Alters, als auch wegen ihrer eigenthümlichen von den gewöhnlichen Gesetzesrollen abweichenden Beschaffenheit das höchste Interesse beanspruchen und für die bibl. Textkritik nicht ohne Belang sind. Beide Rollen dürften zu dem ältesten Handschriften des Pentateuch zählen, welche wir in Europa besitzen.1


1 Baer, Seligmann, 1870. התורה על עורות מאדמים Zwei alte Thora-Rollen aus Arabien und Palästina, Frankfurt: Johannes Alt, 3. On page 16 Johannes Alt noted “Ferner habe ich folgende Manuscripte” regarding an additional eight manuscripts for sale, however it is not clear which of these Alt may have sourced from Shapira. Indications these and other manuscripts with Alt were sourced from Shapira may be found in publications such as Baer, Seligmann, and Delitzsch, Franz, 1872. ספר ישעיה‎ Liber Jesaiae, Lipsiae: Ex Officina Bernhardi Tauchnitz, vi, where Delitzsch noted “Atque adeo contigit potiri duorum Codicum, qui nuper ex oriente advecti sunt. Horum duorum Codicum, quos in adnotationibus criticis saepenumero citavimus, primum Hierosolymitanum nuncupavimus, nam SCHAPIRA Hierosolymitanus, sedulus ille Codicum conquisitor, eum Joanni Altio Francofurtensi vendendum tradidit, qui quidem BAERIUM rogavit, ut exploratum breviter describeret.” A study of the manuscripts Shapira sold via Alt is currently underway.


38 Baer, Seligmann, 1870. התורה על עורות מאדמים Zwei alte Thora-Rollen aus Arabien und Palästina, Frankfurt: Johannes Alt, 3. On page 16 Johannes Alt noted “Ferner habe ich folgende Manuscripte” regarding an additional eight manuscripts for sale, however it is not clear which of these Alt may have sourced from Shapira. Indications these and other manuscripts with Alt were sourced from Shapira may be found in publications such as Baer, Seligmann, and Delitzsch, Franz, 1872. ספר ישעיה‎ Liber Jesaiae, Lipsiae: Ex Officina Bernhardi Tauchnitz, vi, where Delitzsch noted “Atque adeo contigit potiri duorum Codicum, qui nuper ex oriente advecti sunt. Horum duorum Codicum, quos in adnotationibus criticis saepenumero citavimus, primum Hierosolymitanum nuncupavimus, nam SCHAPIRA Hierosolymitanus, sedulus ille Codicum conquisitor, eum Joanni Altio Francofurtensi vendendum tradidit, qui quidem BAERIUM rogavit, ut exploratum breviter describeret.” A study of the manuscripts Shapira sold via Alt is currently underway.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top