Amphilochius letter includes Dionysius to Gerasim monastery in Athos to John Edwin Davis

Steven Avery

Administrator
CARM
https://forums.carm.org/threads/cod...ение-1863-Х-p-362ff.15124/page-5#post-1317063

Edwin John Davis. at p.118 of Elliott/ CODEX SINAITICUS AND THE SIMONIDES AFFAIR. It shows the contempt that Abbott Gerasim had for Simonides.

"These things being reported on the holy
mountain, those who knew Mr. Simonides gave no hearing nor attention to
such absurdities, but one of the principal persons of the holy mountain, the
Superior of the sacred and greatest Laura distinguished for learning and
virtue, by name Hadgi Cionysius, induced by curiosity, wrote officially to
our Hegoumenos of the sacred Russian convent, Gerasimus (who still worthily
presides over it), asking him if there was any truth in Mr. Simonides’
asserions respecting caverns and ancient books, &c. He, however, answered
him officially by a monasterial note that these things were entirely without
existence and without foundation.
"
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Most respected Mr. Edwin John Davis—
+1 received with pleasure on the same day your letter to me of the 26
(8) instant, by which you inquire of my unworthiness respecting the con-
duct while on the holy Mount Athos of Mr. Constantine Simonides, re-
questing me at the same time to communicate to you truthfully all that 1
know respecting him, as having myself passed eighteen years on the said ho-
ly mountain. But although this is not a little difficult for me. both because I *
am much occupied here in the affairs of our holy Church, and also because
much time has now elapsed, and I am therefore unable to state with ac
curacy the dates of the circumstances known to me respecting Mr. Con-
stantine Simonides, nevertheless, 1 say, I proceed by this my present letter
to acquaint you with all that I know and am still able to call to memory
respecting him.
During my residence in Odessa in the house of the sister of the late
General Alexander Sturtza, the Countess K. Etling, she returned from Con
stantinople about the year 1841 or 1842, whither she had gone some time
before, bringing with her the person of whom wc speak, Constantine
Simonides, whom she had taken under her care from Constantinople at the
request of the Reverend Archimandrite Procopius Duedrinos, and after-
wards, with the consent of her said late brother, Alexander Sturtza, in-
troduced him to the Greek school in that place, as having then a slight
knowledge of the rudiments'of our ancient Greek language, and there he
took lessons for some few months. It was there that I first became ac-
quainted with Mr. Simonides, who assured me many times that he had lived
in the sacred Russian monastery on the holy Mount Athos, and that the
Reverend Deacon Benedict of that place was his uncle; also that this
Benedict had sent him to study, and that on the conclusion of his studies he
should return immediately to the holy mountain in order to become a
monk, and afterwards a preacher, with other like things. But having attend
ed, as 1 said before, for some few months only the lessons at Odessa, he was
expelled from the school in consequence of his disorderly conduct, and for
the same reason the Countess Etling and her brother, A. Sturtza, withdrew
from him their patronage, and subsequently Mr. Simonides departed to
Moscow.
About the year 1843, I, having renounced the vanity of this present
would, proceeded to the holy Mount Athos, and there entered the sacred
Russian convent; and making particular inquiries there respecting Mr.
Simonides. I was informed that he had indeed lived there, but had been
dismissed in consequence of his disorderly and scandalous conduct, and
that he had no relationship with the Reverend Benedict, excepting only
that he was a fellow - countryman.
After the lapse of seven or eight years, Mr. Simonides gave out, both
by word and by the press, that during the time he resided in the Russian
convent he had discovered, with the said Reverend Benedict, within the an·
cient monastery of the Russians, caverns containing many ancient parch-
ment manuscripts, of which he had himself taken a quantity, including
some of remarkable antiquity. These things being reported on the holy
mountain, those who knew Mr. Simonides gave no hearing nor attention to
such absurdities, but one of the principal persons of the holy mountain, the
Superior of the sacred and greatest Laura distinguished for learning and
virtue, by name Hadgi Cionysius, induced by curiosity, wrote officially to
our Hegoumenos of the sacred Russian convent, Gerasimus (who still wor-
thily presides over it), asking him if there was any truth in Mr. Simonides’
asserions respecting Caverns and ancient books. &c. He. however, answered
him officially by a monasterial note that these things were entirely without
existence and without foundation.
After two or three years, however, Mr. Simonides came, a second time,
dressed in the European fashion, and I, reminding him of the words which
he had spoken to me at Odessa—namely, that after he had finished his
studies he intended to become a monk on the holy mountain, and ultimate-
ly a preacher—found him far from intending to carry out his professions,
and engrossed by quite contrary ideas. As, however, our Hegoumenos
would not allow him access to the library of our monastery, he went away
to other monasteries on the holy mountain, that he might examine their
libraries, but as in some of the said monasteries he mutilated many
manuscript books, wickedly tearing out of them entire sheets, the entrance
to many libraries of the said monasteries was forbidden him, and thus he
departed from the holy mountain with disgrace.
After some time, however (I know not how long), he went to Constan-
tinople, and presenting himself before the sacred Synod there, he asserted
that he knew a cavqpi in which were buried the autograph Canons of the
Holy Apostles, and this he said he knew from other ancient manuscripts
discovered by him on the holy Mount Athos, relating shamelessly both the
how and the when he had discovered them. There happened to be present,
however, in the sacred Synod, his Blessed James, now Patriarch of Alexan
dria, then Metropolitan of Serres, who proved that Simonides was
shamelessly telling falsehoods, since he, the then Bishop, was well ac-
quainted with the holy mountain having often been there on ecclesiastical
business. In consequence of this, being expelled and driven out from the
sacred Synod of Constantinople, he departed into Europe; and, as it is
reported on the holy mountain, ahving traversed many parts of Europe, he
passed over at last to England, where, as I think, he remains to this day.
Further, I am well aware that this Simonides did bring to light two books, which also I have read: the one is the history of his native place, the
island of Syme; the other, the explanation of the art of painting, of Dionysius the monk: but when he published them I do not exactly remember, nor do I know whence he obtained them; and this is all I know or remember respecting Mr. Constantine Simonides.

120
Lastly, I have informed by the Venerable Priest Constantius, of this
place, who is also a compatriot of Mr. Simonides, that when the latter came
here five or six years ago. he neither visited the holy Mount Sinai, nor Up-
per Egypt.
These things I state for your information; and I avail myself of the pre-
sent opportunity to express to you my high consideration. Your friend,
with respect and esteem,
+Amphilochius (Bishop) of Pelusium
Alexandria, Egypt, the 5th Oct., 1863.
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
The monks of the Russian Monastery of St. Panteleimon on March 4, 1863 sent a letter to the magazine "Pravoslavnoe obozrenie "299. Among other things they write:

"In 1839 in our monastery there was indeed Constantine Simonides, but not among the brothers, but as a guest. He was a poor boy who could, it is true, write in Greek, but no more than that."

Below they write:

"O-but the young man did not reciprocate by his conduct the attention shown to him by the elder Benedict, so that subsequently the future glorious adventurer was denied any hospitality. "300

The monks say that Benedict died in 1841, Simonides says August 29, 1840, while other sources say May 28, 1840. In all probability Constantine stayed with him for less than a year. But Procopius was also in the monastery, who died in 1848. The same monks say that Procopius, who was known to Countess Edling, interceded for Simonides with her and Alex. Sturza after Benedict's death. If Benedict had prosecuted Constantine, Procopius would not have given him a letter of recommendation for Countess Edling.

Sturgas in a letter in 1851 clarifies the issue: "Simoni-dis has indeed lived some time ago in the Holy Monasteries of Athos, near the Archimandrites Benedict and Procopius. The latter in 1842 sent his young protégé under the protection of my sister, Countess Edling Roxandra, who was then in Constantinople." So the monks' narrative that Benedict "sent him away" is not very convincing. Why the monks speak of Constantine in this way will be seen below. We will also see below how and why Constantine was in Constantinople in 1842. In 1843 he returns on Mount Athos, from where he sends and publishes "The Epistle of our Apostolic Father Barnabas to the Jewish believers". The publication by C. D. Rodokanakis, SMYRNA, 1843.
  1. Costantino Simonidis. Opere greche I. Eulyros di Cefalonia. NATIONAL PEOPLE. Liste di manoscritti greci (1818-1861). A cura di Luciano Canfora. Edizioni di Pagina 2012. Bari.
  2. We will analyse all this below.
During Simonides' stay on Mount Athos, as he recounts, some ancient manuscripts were found. This story of the discovery of the manuscripts, real or imagined, would be the cause of the odyssey of Simonides and the uproar that would stir up in Europe and that continues to this day.
Simonides and a cousin of Simonides on his mother's side, the hieromonk Sabbas,

p. 301-302



The monks of the Russian Monastery of St. Panteleimon on March 4, 1863 sent a letter to the magazine "Pravoslavnoe obozrenie "299. Among other things they write: "In 1839 in our monastery there was indeed Constantine Simonides, but not among the brothers, but as a guest. He was a poor boy who could, it is true, write in Greek, but no more than that." Below they write: "O-but the young man did not reciprocate by his conduct the attention shown to him by the elder Benedict, so that subsequently the future glorious adventurer was denied any hospitality. "300 The monks say that Benedict died in 1841, Simonides says August 29, 1840, while other sources say May 28, 1840. In all probability Constantine stayed with him for less than a year. But Procopius was also in the monastery, who died in 1848. The same monks say that Procopius, who was known to Countess Edling, interceded for Simonides with her and Alex. Sturza after Benedict's death. If Benedict had prosecuted Constantine, Procopius would not have given him a letter of recommendation for Countess Edling.


Sturgas in a letter in 1851 clarifies the issue: "Simoni-dis has indeed lived some time ago in the Holy Monasteries of Athos, near the Archimandrites Benedict and Procopius. The latter in 1842 sent his young protégé under the protection of my sister, Countess Edling Roxandra, who was then in Constantinople." So the monks' narrative that Benedict "sent him away" is not very convincing. Why the monks speak of Constantine in this way will be seen below. We will also see below how and why Constantine was in Constantinople in 1842. In 1843 he returns


299.Costantino Simonidis. Opere greche I. Eulyros di Cefalonia. NATIONAL PEOPLE. Liste di manoscritti greci (1818-1861). A cura di Luciano Canfora. Edizioni di Pagina 2012. Bari.


300.We will analyse all this below.


128





NICK BASS. FARMAKIDES Con. Simonides, an uncompromising genius


on Mount Athos, from where he sends and publishes "The Epistle of our Apostolic Father Barnabas to the Jewish believers". The publication by C. D. Rodokanakis, SMYRNA, 1843.


During Simonides' stay on Mount Athos, as he recounts, some ancient manuscripts were found. This story of the discovery of the manuscripts, real or imagined, would be the cause of the odyssey of Simonides and the uproar that would stir up in Europe and that continues to this day.
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
p. 371-372

He confronted many, even the Monks of Mount Athos. We read in a letter to Sturtza, in 1851, who writes516: "And the monastery of Xeropotamos is also peculiarly unfortunate; for it has corrupt tenants, as well as monks of this Satanic order. ... What good hope is there in the monks of materialistic monks, and of those who have a basis in idiosyncrasy517, and whose God is the womb and debauchery? What hope is there for the young men, who are altogether unconscious, and unconcerned, and indeed not living (according to the rules of Athos)? Not certainly not. .... And great is the hope that the other monasteries will follow their example if they persistently and diligently acted to keep and save the


The series of certain sardanic monks, and they are of little faith. And all others desire the common life rather than any other. Otherwise evil will increase to the general detriment of our nation' (sic). These publications also stirred up some monks of Mount Athos against him. This can also explain the letter of the monks of St. Panteleimon to the magazine 'Pravoslavnoe obozrenie'.
 
Top