Steven Avery
Administrator
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/dale.tuggy...cDPbKq1zhmxxWE8Hl?comment_id=1191977772586427
Of course not. But by the way I will mention that YHVH means nothing in English language. If you use the method of reading consonantal text called אִמּוֹת הַקְּרִיאָה you will read the Divine Name as YEHOVAH. This is also what famous Unitarians said:
Miguel Servet in De trinitatis erroribus libri septem, wrote:
"nullus est enim alius Deus, nisi Deus patrum nostrorum יהוה & ille est Pater Iesu Christi " - Liber II 64.
According to him The Name should be pronounced as Iehouah - Liber V 97-98
Iacobi Chii Palaeologi murdered by the Catholic Inquisition wrote in his Using the Name of God by Polish Breatchesis Christiana Dierum Duodecim:
"Ita illud : Audi Israel, Iehovah Elohim noster, Iehovah unus est. ita in Marco explicatur : Audi Israel, Dominus deus noster Κυριος ο Θεος , Dominus, Κυριος, unus est. Et facit Marcus Chrristum ita locum Hebraice, quod ipse retuit Graece."
Fausto Sozzini beaten by a Catholic crowd in Fausti Socini Senensis Opera omnia in duos tomos distincta. Capitis quinti Matthaei 1656 wrote (p.57-58) in Captis sexti Matthaei considering chapter 56 of Isaiah's prophecy, he addresses the question of prayers to Yehovah. There is no indication that he would consider God of the NT to be nameless.
The other Polish Brethern had a similar point of view. It is enough to mention the excellent Unitarian Bible translator Szymon Budny. But the list does not end with him. I have given only some examples.
===================
Steven Avery
Ro Astrom - there is an irony that both sides in this debate reject Jehovah/Yehovah and embrace the corruption "Yahweh" - which is non-Hebrew, non-Christian and actually represents the Jupiter-devil entity highlighted in the book of Acts.
===================
Ro Astrom
Steven Avery - I am very surprised that the Unitarians are implementing the plan of the Vatican agency, because the inventors of the form Yahweh are Catholics. This form was introduced only to discredit the Divine Name - YEHOVAH, which appeared in the …
Ro Astrom
Steven Avery - Some Unitarians believe that the form of the Name is not important, because it is pronounced differently in different languages. However, this is not true. Instead of the form Yehovah or the various forms used interchangeably, they clearly prefer the incorrect form Yahweh, which does not occur in the Hebrew language, in any Hebrew manuscript, and in any important edition of the Tanakh. Just as the form Jesus is incorrect and may be a transliterated form of the blasphemous acronym Yeshu - ישׁ״ו meaning: ימח שמו וזכרו נו [yimmaḥ shəmō veziḵrō no] "may his name and his memory perish" - known to the Jews those opposed to the Master from Nazareth, whose Messianic mission they rejected, similarly the form of Yahweh was introduced by the Vatican agency and its minions to discredit the form of Yehovah that was spread by Protestants and famous Unitarians. Moreover, it is worth asking a question - why is the form Yahweh highly inappropriate ? Because everything indicates that it is not the Holy Name of Almighty God who is Heavenly Father of Yeshua Messiah but the name of someone completely different who has nothing to do with the God of Israel
https://www.facebook.com/dale.tuggy...cDPbKq1zhmxxWE8Hl?comment_id=1191977772586427
Of course not. But by the way I will mention that YHVH means nothing in English language. If you use the method of reading consonantal text called אִמּוֹת הַקְּרִיאָה you will read the Divine Name as YEHOVAH. This is also what famous Unitarians said:
Miguel Servet in De trinitatis erroribus libri septem, wrote:
"nullus est enim alius Deus, nisi Deus patrum nostrorum יהוה & ille est Pater Iesu Christi " - Liber II 64.
According to him The Name should be pronounced as Iehouah - Liber V 97-98
Iacobi Chii Palaeologi murdered by the Catholic Inquisition wrote in his Using the Name of God by Polish Breatchesis Christiana Dierum Duodecim:
"Ita illud : Audi Israel, Iehovah Elohim noster, Iehovah unus est. ita in Marco explicatur : Audi Israel, Dominus deus noster Κυριος ο Θεος , Dominus, Κυριος, unus est. Et facit Marcus Chrristum ita locum Hebraice, quod ipse retuit Graece."
Fausto Sozzini beaten by a Catholic crowd in Fausti Socini Senensis Opera omnia in duos tomos distincta. Capitis quinti Matthaei 1656 wrote (p.57-58) in Captis sexti Matthaei considering chapter 56 of Isaiah's prophecy, he addresses the question of prayers to Yehovah. There is no indication that he would consider God of the NT to be nameless.
The other Polish Brethern had a similar point of view. It is enough to mention the excellent Unitarian Bible translator Szymon Budny. But the list does not end with him. I have given only some examples.
===================
Steven Avery
Ro Astrom - there is an irony that both sides in this debate reject Jehovah/Yehovah and embrace the corruption "Yahweh" - which is non-Hebrew, non-Christian and actually represents the Jupiter-devil entity highlighted in the book of Acts.
===================
Ro Astrom
Steven Avery - I am very surprised that the Unitarians are implementing the plan of the Vatican agency, because the inventors of the form Yahweh are Catholics. This form was introduced only to discredit the Divine Name - YEHOVAH, which appeared in the …
Ro Astrom
Steven Avery - Some Unitarians believe that the form of the Name is not important, because it is pronounced differently in different languages. However, this is not true. Instead of the form Yehovah or the various forms used interchangeably, they clearly prefer the incorrect form Yahweh, which does not occur in the Hebrew language, in any Hebrew manuscript, and in any important edition of the Tanakh. Just as the form Jesus is incorrect and may be a transliterated form of the blasphemous acronym Yeshu - ישׁ״ו meaning: ימח שמו וזכרו נו [yimmaḥ shəmō veziḵrō no] "may his name and his memory perish" - known to the Jews those opposed to the Master from Nazareth, whose Messianic mission they rejected, similarly the form of Yahweh was introduced by the Vatican agency and its minions to discredit the form of Yehovah that was spread by Protestants and famous Unitarians. Moreover, it is worth asking a question - why is the form Yahweh highly inappropriate ? Because everything indicates that it is not the Holy Name of Almighty God who is Heavenly Father of Yeshua Messiah but the name of someone completely different who has nothing to do with the God of Israel
Last edited: