Steven Avery
Administrator
WIP - plan to fill out
Last edited:
Fenton Hort's primitive corruptions and primitive errors
- Thread starter Steven Avery
- Start date
Steven Avery
Administrator
Facebook
NT Textual Criticism - 2024
https://www.facebook.com/groups/NTT...7948431805243750/?comment_id=8168431329910462
Steven Avery
Top contributor
Remember, too, that the textual theoretician Fenton Hort, argued that the New Testament had changed in those year before manuscripts.
Hort called them:
“primitive corruptions”
which left no manuscript evidence.
======================
The New Testament in the original Greek, the text revised by B.F. Westcott and F.J.A. Hort. (1882)
http://books.google.com/books?id=b9YUAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA276
361—37°- Approximate sufficiency of existing documents for the recovery of the genuine text, notwithstanding the existence of some primitive corruptions
======================
We ran into that type of Hortian claim just the other day, Hort arguing in Acts 20:28 "with the blood of his own Son." - but there is no textual evidence for the word "Son".
Here is the Burgon discussion of that Hortian nonsense:
Revision Revised
https://books.google.com/books?id=nXkw1TAatV8C&pg=PA353
Westcott Hort on Acts 20:28
https://books.google.com/books?id=Yc9HAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA98
NT Textual Criticism - 2024
https://www.facebook.com/groups/NTT...7948431805243750/?comment_id=8168431329910462
Steven Avery
Top contributor
Remember, too, that the textual theoretician Fenton Hort, argued that the New Testament had changed in those year before manuscripts.
Hort called them:
“primitive corruptions”
which left no manuscript evidence.
======================
The New Testament in the original Greek, the text revised by B.F. Westcott and F.J.A. Hort. (1882)
http://books.google.com/books?id=b9YUAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA276
361—37°- Approximate sufficiency of existing documents for the recovery of the genuine text, notwithstanding the existence of some primitive corruptions
======================
We ran into that type of Hortian claim just the other day, Hort arguing in Acts 20:28 "with the blood of his own Son." - but there is no textual evidence for the word "Son".
Here is the Burgon discussion of that Hortian nonsense:
Revision Revised
https://books.google.com/books?id=nXkw1TAatV8C&pg=PA353
Westcott Hort on Acts 20:28
https://books.google.com/books?id=Yc9HAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA98
Last edited: