Steven Avery
Administrator
While the Majority and Byzantine texts have over 1,000 New Testament corruptions, our goal here is to highlight some major ones, outside Revelation.
Facebook - Textus Receptus Academy
https://www.facebook.com/groups/467217787457422/posts/1198426747669852
NOTES
Using
Differences Between the Majority Text and the Textus Receptus
https://carm.org/king-james-onlyism/differences-between-the-majority-text-and-the-textus-receptus/
The LaParola apparatus is often very weak on ECW, early church writers.
Church Fathers Scripture Index often has many more
https://www.catholiccrossreference.online/fathers/index.php/
inclusion/omission variants have a totally different dynamic than alternate texts. This is not understood properly in textual criticism theory and Byz/Maj theory. Thus the majority of these texts on this thread are inclusion/omission where the text dropped from the Greek manuscripts.
This might be the easiest place to check the
Robinson-Pierpont text online
https://faraboveall.com/050_BibleTranslation/ENGLISH_RP_Disentangled_RpOrder.html
Hard errors include Luke 2:22, John 1:28, Acts 12:25. Two involve geography and the Vaticanus-Alex text has more geography hard errors. Total NT hard errors I count as around 25.
Some, like Acts 20:28 may be Byz in tie-breaker mode.
Very small variants can have very large import.
Examples
Luke 2:22
Mark 8:1 the question of "and" or "then" has a major chronology effect, causing an error in the "then" text.
King James Onlyism
James Price
Facebook - Textus Receptus Academy
https://www.facebook.com/groups/467217787457422/posts/1198426747669852
NOTES
Using
Differences Between the Majority Text and the Textus Receptus
https://carm.org/king-james-onlyism/differences-between-the-majority-text-and-the-textus-receptus/
The LaParola apparatus is often very weak on ECW, early church writers.
Church Fathers Scripture Index often has many more
https://www.catholiccrossreference.online/fathers/index.php/
inclusion/omission variants have a totally different dynamic than alternate texts. This is not understood properly in textual criticism theory and Byz/Maj theory. Thus the majority of these texts on this thread are inclusion/omission where the text dropped from the Greek manuscripts.
This might be the easiest place to check the
Robinson-Pierpont text online
https://faraboveall.com/050_BibleTranslation/ENGLISH_RP_Disentangled_RpOrder.html
Hard errors include Luke 2:22, John 1:28, Acts 12:25. Two involve geography and the Vaticanus-Alex text has more geography hard errors. Total NT hard errors I count as around 25.
Some, like Acts 20:28 may be Byz in tie-breaker mode.
Very small variants can have very large import.
Examples
Luke 2:22
Mark 8:1 the question of "and" or "then" has a major chronology effect, causing an error in the "then" text.
King James Onlyism
James Price
King James Onlyism
"The doctrine that the King James Version is the only authoritative Bible for English-speaking people has become known as King James Onlyism, taking on the characteristics of a sect. Using evidence from Scripture, history, theology, textual criticism, and ancient and modern Bible versions, this...
books.google.com
Last edited: