Steven Avery
Administrator
H.R.2722 - SAFE Act116th Congress (2019-2020)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2722
Govtrack
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr2722
Original Text
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr2722/text/ih
Latest text
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr2722/text
Before looking at the Act, which has severe federalism issues, let's review what we have learned about the major problems in the Fed elections today.
Let's ask a simple question. The states have existing voter mechanisms. If this Act forces changes for the Federal elections, then to what extent is it also coercive for local elections?
=========================
According to the BIden supporters, the republicans were "criminally negligent" in not voting for this Act!
Jennifer Cohn
=========================
No Hearings in the Senate!
The first sections have nothing about Mail-in ballots, the biggest problem
Is there a random number attached to the ballot that the person can use to check if the system has their vote right?
Nothing about dirty voting rolls.
Who determines "qualified election infrastructure vendors "
" the Chairman, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, " - federal takeover
" Technical Guidelines Development Committee "
(1)
$600,000,000 for fiscal year 2019; and
(2)
$175,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2020, 2022, 2024, and 2026.
Absurd - forcing the ranked choice capability on states for which it has zero purpose.
I have more problems in my earlier tweets
===========
Stupidity
(1)
Risk-limiting audit
The term risk-limiting audit means, with respect to any election contest, a post-election process that—
(A)
has a probability of at least 95 percent of correcting the reported outcome if the reported outcome is not the correct outcome;
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2722
Govtrack
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr2722
Original Text
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr2722/text/ih
Latest text
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr2722/text
Before looking at the Act, which has severe federalism issues, let's review what we have learned about the major problems in the Fed elections today.
Let's ask a simple question. The states have existing voter mechanisms. If this Act forces changes for the Federal elections, then to what extent is it also coercive for local elections?
=========================
According to the BIden supporters, the republicans were "criminally negligent" in not voting for this Act!
Jennifer Cohn
=========================
No Hearings in the Senate!
The first sections have nothing about Mail-in ballots, the biggest problem
Is there a random number attached to the ballot that the person can use to check if the system has their vote right?
Nothing about dirty voting rolls.
Who determines "qualified election infrastructure vendors "
" the Chairman, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, " - federal takeover
" Technical Guidelines Development Committee "
(1)
$600,000,000 for fiscal year 2019; and
(2)
$175,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2020, 2022, 2024, and 2026.
Absurd - forcing the ranked choice capability on states for which it has zero purpose.
I have more problems in my earlier tweets
===========
Stupidity
(1)
Risk-limiting audit
The term risk-limiting audit means, with respect to any election contest, a post-election process that—
(A)
has a probability of at least 95 percent of correcting the reported outcome if the reported outcome is not the correct outcome;
Last edited: