Jamie Andrews dust-up accusations against no virus folks

Steven Avery

Administrator


https://x.com/DOGE_VIROLOGY/status/

MYPOST



1743683417236.png



1743751729066.png
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
https://business.facebook.com/mike....MYpaytDAdkN6H3BbPsdJtUjAc7dkW4oMUqoRr7MmUn4vl
For those of you waiting on these results, I
am sorry that it might take a while, but you
can blame all of those people in
NoVirusINC like Mike Stone for Doxxing
the scientist involved in my project and

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbi...nYhB07ZUdyQ4iWQMyJ7wqURWJuRXv7w&__tn__=,O,P-R
Pamela Everett Goodman
probably


https://www.facebook.com/mike.stone...lkRehMhSC2cTGA7SjLyGWiDQzIfArqQ&__tn__=,O,P-R

https://www.facebook.com/mike.stone...tI-4miolQaMncJwaAZZnefZkWZxwmLA&__tn__=,O,P-R

https://business.facebook.com/mike....t69NGHuJD9FrTRYqcNPA3a5ERkXrVvFHGVnSux5762oql
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Interesting comments here

Proton Magic
Proton Magic & Co.
Jan 5Edited


Dear Mike Stone, so why don't you tell Drs. Tom Cowan and Mark Bailey that their insistence that "purified virus" is necessary as independent variable to do a cell culture is nonsense because using a cell culture is a completely invalid way to determine cytopathic effect of any kind of subject sample.

☞And if there is a purified virus that means a virus has been confirmed by other means that fits the definition of virus and thus doing a cell culture study w/purified virus as an independent variable is meaningless whether cell culture was valid or not. Why are your friends TC and MB even mentioning purified virus?

👉"Purified virus" is just 1984 double speak confusing the majority of readers who are not on our level of understanding definitions of viruses, controls, and cell cultures.
 

Steven Avery

Administrator
This is the original thread: https://x.com/Burki677/status/1876662040653385777 Beyond Jamie falsely claiming that I acted with malice, that threats and harassment occurred, and that there was an FBI investigation, that’s essentially it. Jamie has never provided any evidence of threats or harassment occurring after my article. The individual was already identified from Jamie’s interview as well as videos from Jamie’s article, which was published a day before the thread. In fact, both Jamie and the individual himself told me in June 2024 that he had already been doxxed in November 2023 and had been fired from his job. He also mentioned on two separate occasions that he planned to do interviews about the project. Anyone who really wanted to could have found his name linked to his Twitter profile, as he was not particularly shy about his name being out there. Regardless, the person I supposedly doxxed has never stated that I doxxed him or that he was harassed or threatened. In fact, we are on good terms. He even had the opportunity to correct someone in Telegram who said Jamie’s doxxing accusations were false but chose not to.

x.com

1743751604502.jpeg
 
Top