Jeremy Hammond contra Cowen, Massey et al (does not mention German scientists)

Steven Avery

Administrator
1622688530287.png

 

Steven Avery

Administrator
Jeremy dances and dances

=======================================


Jeremy R. Hammond Cg>jeremyrhammond • Jun 2
In this interview, I discuss the false claim that SARS-CoV-2 has not been
isolated, germ versus terrain theory, natural versus vaccine-conferred
immunity, and much more.
#SARSCoV2 #COVID19 #Vaccines #Naturallmmunity

Steven Avery
Hi Jeremy,
Do you believe that inactive/dead RNA/DNA snippets ar<
able to hijack cell replication causing gazillions of new
viruses and cell bursting (lysis)?
This is part of the theorized life-cycle of the virus!
If you do, can you give any tangible evidence that this occurs?

Jeremy R. Hammond (3)jeremyrhammond • Jun 3
Replying to @StevenAveryNY
Don’t understand you’re question, but if you’re asking whether non-viable
RNA fragments are infectious, by definition, no.

Jeremy R. Hammond s>jeremyrhammond • Jun 5
I could not possibly generalize whether "other writers" call non-viable RNA
fragments a "virus". You’ll have to ask a more specific question.
Yes, I am sure I disagree with those denying the existence of SARS-CoV-2
(and all viruses). Mullis did not deny the existence of viruses.

Jeremy R. Hammond @jeremyrhammond • Jun 7
Non-viable RNA fragments of a virus are obviously not a whole virus. That is a tautology.

Steven Avery @ Steven Avery NY • Jun 10
Hi Jeremy,
My question allows you to define "virus" however you feel comfy.
Do you believe the viruses hijack cell replication, so the cells create new
viruses, either 100s or gazillions?
Under modern virus theory, "viable" is a tricky word
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...-science/how-long-can-virus-live-outside-body


I cannot answer the question if you do not help me
understand it by answering my question of clarification.
10:18 PM • Jun 10, 2021 • Twitter for Android


Hi Jeremy,
Your clarification question is irrelevant, you believe viruses cause disease,
you can define them as you please.
The question remains, do you believe "viruses" actually hijack cell
replication?
Please, no more dodging, the question is straight-forward.
Thanks!
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
===========================

Christine Carson @Chris_F_Carson • Jun 10
Replying to @skehoemusic @HannahanRichard and 3 others

Dr K confuses viruses with exosomes
That's a HUGE mistake to make
Exosomes & viruses are easy to tell apart
(see checklist)
Multiplication (replication) in cells
is one of the biggest differences
Viruses do
Exosomes don’t
Perhaps he’s a good psychiatrist

Christine url
https://twitter.com/Chris_F_Carson/status/1402971681497382912?s=20

===========================

Steven Avery @ Steven Avery NY • 7h
Hi Christine,
Please present the strongest, best evidence for the hijacking of cell
replication (create duplicate viruses, hundreds or gazillions). We agree that
this is a sine qua non of the modern virus life-cycle theory. Where do we see
lysis, the residue of many burst cells?

Steven url
https://twitter.com/StevenAveryNY/status/1403218615952973824?s=20

===========================

NO ANSWER TO ANY OF THE THREE RESPONSES

1623444640032.png


 
Last edited:
Top