Steven Avery
Administrator
The BIG THREE 2017 blog posts
James Snapp - 3 blog posts
Sinaiticus Is Not a Forgery - Setting the Stage- March 21, 2017
http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/sinaiticus-is-not-forgery-setting-stage.html
The Text of the Gospels: Ten Reasons Why Sinaiticus Was Not Made By Simonides
http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/ten-reasons-why-sinaiticus-was-not-made.html
The Text of the Gospels: Ten More Reasons Sinaiticus Was Not Made by Simonides
http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/ten-more-reasons-sinaiticus-was-not.html
======================================
Steven Avery - 3 Response Posts
Comment on the first blog post, the urls have changed by the Xenforo shift.
Greetings!
Readers can see my response to the three James Snapp Sinaiticus authenticity blog posts here:
PureBibleForum
James Snapp attempts to defend authenticity of Sinaiticus
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...pts-to-defend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/
James Snapp #1 - Setting the Stage
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...fend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/#post-940
James Snapp #2 - Ten Reasons Why Sinaiticus Was Not Made By Simonides
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...fend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/#post-942
James Snapp #3 - Ten More Reasons Sinaiticus Was Not Made by Simonides
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...fend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/#post-953
Three posts, in a row. While this is still a WIP, most all the points are easily handled. And a good number of the points raised, looked at carefully, actually end up favoring non-authenticity.
============================
See also the new book, and ebook, just released:
Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' A Fake?
David W. Daniels
http://www.chick.com/catalog/books/1442.asp
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155083519476080&set=a.260636646079.149319.561561079&type=3
Hopefully, James Snapp will grace us with a review
. James gets credit for at least making an effort to look at some of the early debate and to share various points that have been given in the effort to shore up the Tischendorf 4th century and authenticity claims.
============================
James Snapp - 3 blog posts
Sinaiticus Is Not a Forgery - Setting the Stage- March 21, 2017
http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/sinaiticus-is-not-forgery-setting-stage.html
The Text of the Gospels: Ten Reasons Why Sinaiticus Was Not Made By Simonides
http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/ten-reasons-why-sinaiticus-was-not-made.html
The Text of the Gospels: Ten More Reasons Sinaiticus Was Not Made by Simonides
http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/03/ten-more-reasons-sinaiticus-was-not.html
======================================
Steven Avery - 3 Response Posts
Comment on the first blog post, the urls have changed by the Xenforo shift.
Greetings!
Readers can see my response to the three James Snapp Sinaiticus authenticity blog posts here:
PureBibleForum
James Snapp attempts to defend authenticity of Sinaiticus
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...pts-to-defend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/
James Snapp #1 - Setting the Stage
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...fend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/#post-940
James Snapp #2 - Ten Reasons Why Sinaiticus Was Not Made By Simonides
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...fend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/#post-942
James Snapp #3 - Ten More Reasons Sinaiticus Was Not Made by Simonides
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...fend-authenticity-of-sinaiticus.468/#post-953
Three posts, in a row. While this is still a WIP, most all the points are easily handled. And a good number of the points raised, looked at carefully, actually end up favoring non-authenticity.
============================
See also the new book, and ebook, just released:
Is the 'World's Oldest Bible' A Fake?
David W. Daniels
http://www.chick.com/catalog/books/1442.asp
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10155083519476080&set=a.260636646079.149319.561561079&type=3
Hopefully, James Snapp will grace us with a review
. James gets credit for at least making an effort to look at some of the early debate and to share various points that have been given in the effort to shore up the Tischendorf 4th century and authenticity claims.============================
Last edited: