Mark's dependence on Luke - the end of Markan priority - plus support for the traditional ending

Steven Avery

Administrator
Gloag rips the Markus Interruptus theory to shreds.

Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels (1895)
Paton James Gloag
https://books.google.com/books?id=F8lNAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA198
http://www.bookcracker.com/Gloag4.pdf

If, then, the Gospel once had a conclusion, actual or intended, we are entitled to ask the objectors to this passage, What has become of it ? Two answers have been given to this question. The one, favoured by Norton,3 is that Mark was prevented finishing his Gospel; either because Peter, to whom he was indebted for his information, perished at this time in the persecution by Nero (Michaelis), or because Mark himself died (Davidson). Both of these are merely gratuitous suppositions. Mark was not so entirely dependent on Peter that he could not finish his Gospel without his aid; and it would be most extraordinary that he himself should die at the very time when he was about to finish his Gospel.

3 Norton’s Genuineness of the Gospels, vol. i. p. 221.

===========================================

Joseph Waite talks of Mark's familiarity with the Matthew and Peter truths, does not discuss the issue of the reader.
https://books.google.com/books?id=QzEFNxb3vFMC&pg=PA6
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Additional writers who use the Galilee verses in Mark as support for the non-authenticity, theorizing a lost ending.

From Tradition to Gospel (1971)
by Martin Dibelius, Bertram Lee Woolf
https://books.google.com/books?id=4OUwdg0zRc4C&pg=PA181

The gospel according to St. Mark: the Greek text with introduction, notes and indices (1905)
Henry Barclay Swete
https://books.google.com/books?id=yiVWAAAAMAAJ&pg=PR93

The Resurrection and Modern Thought (1915)
William John Sparrow-Simpson
https://books.google.com/books?id=ueVNAQAAMAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s
 
Last edited:
Top