Steven Avery
Administrator
===================================
Pure Bible Forum
Polycrates - incredible example of myopia of modern writers missing the historical discussion
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...iters-missing-the-historical-discussion.1761/
Polycrates speaks about John as high priest - Richard Bauckham analysis
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...s-high-priest-richard-bauckham-analysis.1503/
===================================
This comes out of a discussion with Dean Furlong.
We noticed the robustness of the 1700s discussions.
The modern writers are pretty much having the same discussion, without acknowledging the history.
Dean Furlong
Dean Furlong has a chapter on the Polycrates ref in his dissertation, and two chapters in the book John also Called Mark.
Pure Bible Forum
Polycrates - incredible example of myopia of modern writers missing the historical discussion
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...iters-missing-the-historical-discussion.1761/
Polycrates speaks about John as high priest - Richard Bauckham analysis
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...s-high-priest-richard-bauckham-analysis.1503/
===================================
This comes out of a discussion with Dean Furlong.
We noticed the robustness of the 1700s discussions.
The modern writers are pretty much having the same discussion, without acknowledging the history.
Dean Furlong
Dean Furlong has a chapter on the Polycrates ref in his dissertation, and two chapters in the book John also Called Mark.
"Hippolytus' Ode on the Scriptures is important too with regard to the petalon, as well as the references to Mark as a priest wearing the petalon. And Epiphanius refers to James as a priest wearing the petalon too."
Last edited: