Revelation

Steven Avery

Administrator
The main goal here is text that was totally missed on the first pass and then added in the margin
Maybe consider large deletions as well.


======================

Revelation 1:1 - 2:7
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=59&chapter=1&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0

======================

Revelation, 3:5 - 4:8 library: BL folio: 326b scribe: A
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=2&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=r&zoomSlider=0

Rev 4:5 - end of page
- HT
α ειϲιν τα επτα πνευματα του
θυ
κ(αι) ενωπιον του θρονου

======================

Rev 5:1 - bottom of column one
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=2&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=v&zoomSlider=0
βιβλιον γεγραμμενον

======================

Revelation, 6:6 - 7:12 library: BL folio: 327b scribe: A
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=3&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=r&zoomSlider=0
Rev 7:10 deletion

======================

Revelation, 7:12 - 9:5 library: BL folio: 328 scribe: A
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=3&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=v&zoomSlider=0
Rev 9:2 -
του φρεατοϲ κ(αι) εκ του̣
καπνου

omitted

Also Arabic notes under the first three columns, pic in the Arabic Notes section

======================

Revelation, 9:5 - 10:8 library: BL folio: 328b scribe: A
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=4&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=r&zoomSlider=0
Running Title on top
Words added in margin in 9:13, CSP puts in text

======================

Revelation, 9:5 - 10:8 library: BL folio: 328b scribe: A
Revekation 10:6 - HT
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=4&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=r&zoomSlider=0
κ(αι) την θαλαϲϲαν κ(αι) τα εν αυτ

======================

Revelation, 10:8 - 11:19 library: BL folio: 329 scribe: A
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=4&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=v&zoomSlider=5

On top margin
Omission #1
θαλαϲϲηϲ και επι τηϲ
Omission #2 - Revelation 11:8 -
και εγγυϲ ο ποταμοϲ

running title

Bottom first column
Revelation 11;1
κ(αι) εϲτηκει ο αγγελοϲ λεγων
dark ink, wild font
cc*


======================

Revelation, 11:19 - 13:4 library: BL folio: 329b scribe: A
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manu...lioNo=5&lid=en&quireNo=90&side=r&zoomSlider=0

======================

Aleph
c actually refers to a large group of scribes (perhaps five) who worked in the seventh century and made the large majority of the corrections in the manuscript. Often they cannot be reliably distinguished. The most important (and probably the first) of these is known as
Aleph
c.a, who did a great deal to conform the manuscript to the Byzantine text (and not infrequently undid the work of
Aleph
a). The next phase of corrections, labelled
Aleph
c.b, may perhaps have been the work of three scribes, who added a few more Byzantine readings. In addition, the symbols
Aleph
c.Pamph is sometimes used to refer to a scribe who worked primarily if not exclusively on the Old Testament (his corrections, in fact, seem to be confined to 1 Kingdoms-Esther), commenting that he was working from a Pamphilian manuscript, while
Aleph
c.c and
Aleph
c.c* refer to two minor correctors from late in the seventh century;
many of their changes are in the Apocalypse. We may ignore
Aleph
d; this symbol is not generally used.

Note check if CPamph may have been done separately on the section taken out.
 
Last edited:

Steven Avery

Administrator
Why is Corrector S1 ( CorrectorS1 for search ) supposedly not the original.

Check the theory out.

Look at the same word at the beginning of Revelation - identical letter forms, likely identical ink
https://codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=59&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0

1608570359300.png


==========

Corrector s1 rev 1-1.jpg


S1’s corrections were part of the manuscripts production process, but it is not always possible to tell whomade the correction – the firsthand or another scriptorium corrector.
https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/9150/1/Edmondson2019PhD.pdf

Actually, it looks 100% clear that the scribe of Revelation put in the superscription.


=============================

The Titles of the Gospels in the Earliest New Testament Manuscripts
Simon J. Gathercole
https://www.academia.edu/7968624/The_Titles_of_the_Gospels_in_the_Earliest_New_Testament_Manuscripts
30 See K. Lake, Codex Sinaiticus Petropolitanus: The New Testament, the Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas, Oxford 1911, xxiv (cf. xxii and Plate I).
33 Lake, Codex Sinaiticus Petropolitanus (see n. 30), xx (where the argument is also made for a single scribe as the source of the superscriptions); T.C. Skeat, The Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Vaticanus and Constantine, JThS 50 (1999) 583–625, here 603. The subscriptio to Mark and the opening title to Luke are written by Scribe D (and therefore are still part of the original production) on a cancel leaf (Jongkind, Scribal Habits [see n. 27], 45–46).

1608645090790.png
1608645139216.png
 
Last edited:
Top