the rise and fall of lectio difficilior (harder reading)

[Steven Avery]

This canon is more fallacy than truth.

We start with the caveat from Martin Litchfield West

Then to how easy piddle omission corruptions (Vaticanus and P75 as examples) will be the most normal scribal error, and then the corruption will be supported by the faux canon.

We gave Acts 8:37 as a simple example.

 

[Steven Avery]

Here are the spots on PBF with discussions.

the rise and fall of lectio brevior
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/the-rise-and-fall-of-lectio-brevior.58/

the rise and fall of lectio difficilior (harder reading)
https://www.purebibleforum.com/inde...ll-of-lectio-difficilior-harder-reading.2027/

 

[Steven Avery]

Erasmus, Jean Le Clerc, and the Principle of the Harder Reading, (1978)
Jerry H. Bentley
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2860228

The Bible Translator
The "Harder Reading" in Textual Criticism (1982)
J. M. Ross
http://www.ubs-translations.org/tbt/1982/01/TBT198201.html?num=138

 

[Steven Avery]

Matthew 10:10 // Mark 6:9 -- Matthew 20:22 and John 3:13 -

Matthew 2:6
Matthew 13:35
Matthew 14:30 boisterous -
Matthew 27:9 - Jeremy

Mark 1:2
Mark 1:41
Mark 6:22
Mark 7:19
Ending of Mark

Luke 2:14
Luke 2:22
Luke 2:33
Luke 4:44
Luke 14:5
Luke 22:19

John 4:1
John 7:8
John 8:6
John 7:39
John 8:39
Pericope Adulterae

Acts 8:37
Acts 9:25
Acts 12:25
Acts 20:28

Romans 11:6
Romans 12:13

Philippians 1.11
Philippians 2:1

1 Corinthians 7:35
1 Corinthians 10:9
1 Corinthians 10:23
1 Corinthians 13:5
1 Corinthians 15:51

1 Timothy 3:16 - Edmund Beckett

James 2:17
James 2:20

1 John 4:3
1 John 5:7

Revelation 22:19

 

[Steven Avery]

https://www.facebook.com/groups/NTTextualCriticism/permalink/749871068433229/

Temporarily at Tobit