VAERS database

Steven Avery

Administrator
Placed on Nextdoor

VAERS database is searchable
https://medalerts.org/

Search on 1/22/2021
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findf...P1=AGE&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19&VAXTYPES=COVID-1
“Found 9,845 cases where Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19)”

Government Database Shows 7,844 Injuries and 181 Deaths Following COVID Vaccine as of Jan. 15 says Children's Health Defense
This could be the tip of the iceberg as studies of this database show only 1% of all adverse events. Drug companies and media blame deaths on "coincidence."
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...-says-childrens-health-defense-301217037.html

However, the 1% figure is from a different time and context. And I will plan on contacting Rita Schreffler with that counterpoint.

BIG PHARMA › VIEWS
329 Deaths + 9,516 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show
The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Jan. 22 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 329 reported deaths, 285 were from the U.S., and 44 were from other countries. The average age of those who died was 76.5.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/...njuries-reported-following-covid-vaccine-cdc/

Shimei2 days ago
At the CDC ACIP meeting on Dec. 20, Dr. Thomas Clark stated V-SAFE reports showed 3,150 Health Impact Events, defined as unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional, out of 112,807 having received the 1st dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. That was 2.8%. At last Wednesday's emergency ACIP meeting the briefing on V-SAFE failed to state Health Impact Events reported from V-SAFE after 21,843,033 received one doses of the two COVID-19 vaccines. Why didn't the briefer show Health Impact Events again? Is it because 2.8% of vaccine recipients would have submitted 609,840 Health Impact Reports (estimate based on previous report percentage)? That would be headline news. Are they hiding something?



  • Avatar
    ahoj
    2 days ago
    👿 This is a HUGE HUMAN EXPERIMENT(resulting in GMOed human beings), partly entirely without their consent or proper understanding of the gene therapy injection ingredients list and their function in their own bodies!!!!
    The Pfizer summary admits how MANY issues in the safety of their gene therapy agent they intentionally omitted, for example:
    a) Pharmacokinetic studies have not been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
    b) No absorption studies were conducted for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2
    c) No excretion studies have been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
    d) No PK drug interaction studies have been conducted with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
    e) No single dose toxicity studies have been performed.
    f) No toxicokinetic studies have been performed with the vaccine.
    g) No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2, as the components of all vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have genotoxic potential
    h) Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of all vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Carcinogenicity testing is generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases
    i) Prenatal and postnatal development, including maternal functionNo such studies have been done. Studies in which the offspring (juvenile animals) are dosed and/or further evaluated No such studies have been done.
    j) Local tolerance : No such studies have been done.
    k) Other toxicity studies: No such studies have been done.
    l) "Guideline on the Environmental Risk Assessment of Medicinal Products for Human Use" published 01 June2006, due to their nature, vaccines and lipids are unlikely to result in a significant risk to the environment. Therefore, an environmental risk assessment is not provided in this application.


  • Avatar
    Anne Teller
    ahoj19 hours ago • edited
    According to a manual from the CDC about the PCR test, the SAR Cov 2 virus was never isolated. The manual is dated 12-01-2020, so would be up-to-date. On page 42, of the manual the CDC says that it never received a isolate of the virus, so it mixed some substances that the scientists felt would mimic the virus to become the PCR test.
    If the PCR test is indeed a mimic of the virus because there is no virus isolate, then what is in the vaccine? You look like you've done your homework, what do you make of it? I have included a pdf of the CDC PCR test manual, and 3 video clips of interviews of Kary Mullis who made the PCR test. These are source documents straight from the horses mouth. I wrote this comment below with links for a generalized audience. One who may not know about the importance of things like source documents. It already had the links in it, so I just used it for you.
    These 4 links, including the CDC-Manual, and 3 video clips of Kary Mullis the scientist who developed the PCR test, are information you need to fight this battle that is all about power and control.
    CDC Manual describing the PCR Test
    According to the CDC manual dated 12-01-2020 about the PCR test, they never received an isolate of the Sars Cov 2 virus. Therefore, to make the PCR test, they state in the manual on page 42 that they combined substances that would mimic the virus. So, if the PCR test has a substance mimicking the virus, what is the substance in the vax? You should be asking this question of all officials. Here is link below to the pdf of the CDC Manual instructions for the PCR test, look on page 42 in the second paragraph where they admit they never received an isolate of the Sars Cov 2 virus. If some one tells you the virus was purified and isolated as required ask them to show you the source (primary) document. An example of a source document is the CDC PCR manual. It can't be based on someone who said they were told about a monkey study where 4 monkeys died in some obscure lab somewhere, or they were told their friend died of covid, so they know it's true. https://www.fda.gov/media/1...
    Video Clip with Kary Mullis interview
    Kary Mullis who developed the PCR test said that it should not be used for diagnosing infections. It would not be accurate because you can expand the smallest molecule to make it look like many molecules and prove anything you want as far as molecules in the body -- especially if the amplification is set over 35. Even if set low, he says you can't use it to diagnose a specific infection. An example would be a specific virus like SARS Cov 2. Unfortunately, Kary Mullis died unexpectedly August 7, 2019, only 3 months before the supposed virus outbreak in Wuhan, China, hmm. Therefore, Kary isn't here to tell us in person. Please save any of his videos you can find as most were taken down all at once from You Tube. https://www.bitchute.com/vi...
    However, look what he had to say in this video interview. Just replace the word HIV with Sars Cov 2 and if he had lived no doubt he would be saying the same thing, especially since the CDC admitted the Sars Cov 2 hasn't been isolated in an official CDC document (see link above). Notice that the last researcher interviewed on this video is from South Africa and said that the best way to see if the pandemic death counts are real is to talk to funeral directors and undertakers. Ask them if they have seen business booming, growing by leaps and bounds since the pandemic began and before the vax was distributed (since now deaths that may be caused by the vax are being blamed on the virus). They should have seen business boom if the death toll is like it is being presented on the MSM news outlets as 400,000 in the US. Kary Mullis also clarifies what is a source document that can prove a virus has been properly isolated and what is not an appropriate document. If only we had more honest scientists who were not afraid of losing jobs, grants or even their lives. This video has the video clip interview of Kary Mullis talking about source documents, worth seeing again, but then it also includes journalists afterwards that with the last interview of a journalist talking about death numbers. https://www.bitchute.com/vi...
    Kary Mullis interview clip from interview by Gary Null - what he thinks of leader
    You won't be surprised that it's the basically the same cast of characters that is running the current virus "pandemic" that were involved with HIV. Here Kary Mullis is sharing what he thinks about one of the main influencers in both "pandemics," Dr. Fauci https://www.bitchute.com/vi...
    These are considered source documents as they are directly from the main sources -- the CDC and several Kary Mullis interviews. However, you are still encouraged to conduct your own research.


  • Avatar
    Anne Teller
    ahoj19 hours ago • edited
    According to a manual from the CDC about the PCR test, the SAR Cov 2 virus was never isolated. The manual is dated 12-01-2020, so would be up-to-date. On page 42, of the manual the CDC says that it never received a isolate of the virus, so it mixed some substances that the scientists felt would mimic the virus to become the PCR test.
    If the PCR test is indeed a mimic of the virus because there is no virus isolate, then what is in the vaccine? You look like you've done your homework, what do you make of it? I have included a pdf of the CDC PCR test manual, and 3 video clips of interviews of Kary Mullis who made the PCR test. These are source documents straight from the horses mouth. I wrote this comment below with links for a generalized audience. One who may not know about the importance of things like source documents. It already had the links in it, so I just used it for you.
    These 4 links, including the CDC-Manual, and 3 video clips of Kary Mullis the scientist who developed the PCR test, are information you need to fight this battle that is all about power and control.
    CDC Manual describing the PCR Test
    According to the CDC manual dated 12-01-2020 about the PCR test, they never received an isolate of the Sars Cov 2 virus. Therefore, to make the PCR test, they state in the manual on page 42 that they combined substances that would mimic the virus. So, if the PCR test has a substance mimicking the virus, what is the substance in the vax? You should be asking this question of all officials. Here is link below to the pdf of the CDC Manual instructions for the PCR test, look on page 42 in the second paragraph where they admit they never received an isolate of the Sars Cov 2 virus. If some one tells you the virus was purified and isolated as required ask them to show you the source (primary) document. An example of a source document is the CDC PCR manual. It can't be based on someone who said they were told about a monkey study where 4 monkeys died in some obscure lab somewhere, or they were told their friend died of covid, so they know it's true. https://www.fda.gov/media/1...
    Video Clip with Kary Mullis interview
    Kary Mullis who developed the PCR test said that it should not be used for diagnosing infections. It would not be accurate because you can expand the smallest molecule to make it look like many molecules and prove anything you want as far as molecules in the body -- especially if the amplification is set over 35. Even if set low, he says you can't use it to diagnose a specific infection. An example would be a specific virus like SARS Cov 2. Unfortunately, Kary Mullis died unexpectedly August 7, 2019, only 3 months before the supposed virus outbreak in Wuhan, China, hmm. Therefore, Kary isn't here to tell us in person. Please save any of his videos you can find as most were taken down all at once from You Tube. https://www.bitchute.com/vi...
    However, look what he had to say in this video interview. Just replace the word HIV with Sars Cov 2 and if he had lived no doubt he would be saying the same thing, especially since the CDC admitted the Sars Cov 2 hasn't been isolated in an official CDC document (see link above). Notice that the last researcher interviewed on this video is from South Africa and said that the best way to see if the pandemic death counts are real is to talk to funeral directors and undertakers. Ask them if they have seen business booming, growing by leaps and bounds since the pandemic began and before the vax was distributed (since now deaths that may be caused by the vax are being blamed on the virus). They should have seen business boom if the death toll is like it is being presented on the MSM news outlets as 400,000 in the US. Kary Mullis also clarifies what is a source document that can prove a virus has been properly isolated and what is not an appropriate document. If only we had more honest scientists who were not afraid of losing jobs, grants or even their lives. This video has the video clip interview of Kary Mullis talking about source documents, worth seeing again, but then it also includes journalists afterwards that with the last interview of a journalist talking about death numbers. https://www.bitchute.com/vi...
    Kary Mullis interview clip from interview by Gary Null - what he thinks of leader
    You won't be surprised that it's the basically the same cast of characters that is running the current virus "pandemic" that were involved with HIV. Here Kary Mullis is sharing what he thinks about one of the main influencers in both "pandemics," Dr. Fauci https://www.bitchute.com/vi...
    These are considered source documents as they are directly from the main sources -- the CDC and several Kary Mullis interviews. However, you are still encouraged to conduct your own research.


  • Avatar
    Robert Clark
    a day ago
    Copied below is a letter I wrote to the CDC. It’s stunning that a vaccine company can have a new vaccine approved for use to the general public without that company revealing the safety data for the 2nd dose.
    ——————————————————————————————-
    Hello. I was quite concerned to read of the deaths in Norway after patients were given the Pfizer vaccine. It should be noted that Pfizer has not revealed the adverse events after the 2nd dose of their vaccine during testing, only for the 1st. See the supplementary file to their published report here:
    Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
    Fernando P. Polack, M.D., et al.
    December 31, 2020
    N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603-2615
    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
    https://www.nejm.org/doi/fu...
    The table showing adverse events after the 1st dose is Table S3 on page 9.
    However, there does not appear in this supplementary file a similar table for adverse events after the 2nd dose.
    The number of deaths of 23 after only 20,000 vaccinations in elderly patients in Norway is quite high. Given these deaths, Pfizer should be required to also reveal the adverse events after the 2nd dose.
    Quite frankly, I’m surprised a vaccine manufacturer can get approval to the general public for a new vaccine without presenting safety information on both the 1st and the 2nd doses of their vaccine.
    Am I correct in assuming if someone in the public asked the CDC what’s the safety profile on the Pfizer vaccine after the 2nd dose their response would be, “We don’t know”?
Mike6 hours ago
This article is deeply misleading. Either the author does not understand what VAERS data actually is as well as having failed to actually look at the data (aside from doing a quick and dirty count of the results returned when searching for "deaths" and "covid") - or the author is making an intentionally disingenuous attempt at misinformation.
Please see https://www.quora.com/Lates... for details.




    • Avatar
      John Stone
      Mod Mike4 hours ago
      Completely wrong. First of all we protested when the CDC tried to use VAERS data to calculate anaphylaxis incidence from the Moderna product. All this data can do is suggest. What we believe is completely wrong is to put all the deaths - and there are evidently a lot of them - down to coincidence without adequate public scrutiny.
    • 1

    • Reply
    • Share ›
 
Last edited:
Top