Steven Avery
Administrator
https://www.facebook.com/mike.stone...1ZzkR3pirogvf2Xs3sCwKxnoWuBB1f8v1pu28vdz4E4Tl
business.facebook.com
https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/14/thomas-rivers-debunks-chickenpox-in-1923/
Steven Avery
They had not yet developed their wacky theories that this tiny "viruses" (inactive or dead) somehow have the innate intelligence to hijack cellular functions for reproduction.
This became "science" around the 1950s, without a single experimental proof. Which should have been a landmark discovery and reproducible. However, there was no such actual demonstration, evidence, or proof.
It would be interesting to study the literature and get the exact quotes where this began to be considered "science".
Steven Avery 评论了: They had not yet developed their wacky theories that these tiny "viruses" (inactive or dead) somehow, after entering cells, have the innate intelligence to hijack cellular functions for reproduction! This became "science" around t
In 1923, virologist Thomas Rivers acknowledged the foundational fallacy ingrained within virology where researchers beg the question of a "virus" to...
https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/14/thomas-rivers-debunks-chickenpox-in-1923/
Steven Avery
They had not yet developed their wacky theories that this tiny "viruses" (inactive or dead) somehow have the innate intelligence to hijack cellular functions for reproduction.
This became "science" around the 1950s, without a single experimental proof. Which should have been a landmark discovery and reproducible. However, there was no such actual demonstration, evidence, or proof.
It would be interesting to study the literature and get the exact quotes where this began to be considered "science".