Romans 10:9 (AV)
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus,
and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead,
thou shalt be saved.
Facebook
New Testament Textual Criticism
Romans 10:9
https://www.facebook.com/groups/NTTextualCriticism/posts/7526039954149606/
Steven Avery
This is a great case of Vaticanus primacy taken to an extreme by Westcott-Hort, later the Critical Text moved away from the Vaticanus error.
Romans
Sanday and Headlam
https://books.google.com/books?id=7XuIDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT466
Buck Daniel
obviously an Egyptian corruption. Sometimes I wonder if B was as much a back-translation of Coptic as D was of Latin.
Steven Avery
Buck Daniel - interesting Vaticanus production theory.
Have you hit variants where the source-target relationship looks to be Coptic—>Vaticanus as more Ockham-friendly than Vaticanus—>Coptic?
Schoyen 2650 in Matthew (also Schiede) might give a base of operations. James M. Leonard.
Earlier, Hoskier.
An Early Egyptian Manuscript Named Mae
https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/.../an-early-egyptian...
“Martijn Linssen said...
Perhaps it is time to reconsider the assumption that Coptic was translated from Greek - and to test the reverse theory.”
There are a couple of points made by James Snapp on that blog page that seem to point in that direction.
Textual criticism gate-keepers may be discomfited by this theory, considering their romantic attachment to Vaticanus.
