What Does Homestead Heritage Teach - Netherlands - Daniel van Deutekom

[Steven Avery]

What Does Homestead Heritage Teach - Netherlands - Daniel van Deutekom

English
https://www.godfirst.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/What-does-Homestead-Heritage-teach.pdf

Dutch
https://www.godfirst.nl/wp-content/...erborgen-Onderwijs-Van-Homestead-Heritage.pdf

Facebook-Youtube - interview with Joseph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QOJ3ZKDqZI

Youtube - 1820 Foundation - 3-way discussion on Homestead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ggjc3bFQU4
Better
https://youtu.be/7QOJ3ZKDqZI?si=lwUnu0pbvda-lFLY

=========

Homestead Heritage Contacts

Interview with Joseph Haugh
https://www.facebook.com/groups/homesteadheritagecontacts/posts/3415330352099091/

47 page book from the Netherlands

https://m.facebook.com/groups/homesteadheritagecontacts/permalink/3420364918262301/

=========

https://twitter.com/dsvandeutekom?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

Home - God First

GOD FIRST.FAITH GENERATION. God First heeft als missie om een gelovige generatie op te richten die vol voor God gaat! Lees verder. NEXT EVENTS! TICKETS 14-15 juni – Revival Weekend […]

www.godfirst.nl

Daniël van Deutekom

Daniël van Deutekom. 2,061 次赞 · 55 人在谈论. Evangelist | @godfirst.nl | Faith Generation ✝️

www.facebook.com

 

[Steven Avery]

Daniel





Facebook

This had an error, so I quickly deleted it

======——-

Quote 8 from Daniel,and then his discussion and some notes:

========

Homestead Q & A

Do you believe in the Holy Trinity?
https://www.homesteadheritage.com/faq

We believe that the one God of the Old and New Testaments has manifested Himself as the Father in creation, the Son in redemption and the Holy Spirit in regeneration. We believe that Jesus Christ was both fully man and fully God. We don’t commonly choose the word “trinity” to describe the nature of God, since there has historically been so much confusion swirling around the meaning of this term (and the word is actually not even found in the Bible). Nonetheless, we do acknowledge an economic trinity within the godhead (a trinity of expressions, yet one deity) as opposed to an ontological trinity (a trinity of intrinsically distinct “persons”).

===============

First, Daniel is critical of Honestead’s saying:

“was … fully God”

And uses that to accuse Homestead of adoptionism.

Daniel
“On their site they say that Jesus was fully God. Was. Past tense.”

And I don’t see that as a fair critique. Christians writing of Jesus Christ often use “was” in that phrase.

“was born … fully God”

So the past tense is natural.

Personally, I don’t use that phrase. Non-biblical, an extrapolation, awkward.

Homestead does have very problematic words about the Lord Jesus (e.g “a plain man”) but this one “was born fully man and fully God” gets by ok from a Diety perspective as common from Christian writers.