external evidences - approaches of Snapp, Hester, Lunn reviewed and compared

Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
This section will look at the three main modern resources, and auxiliary resources and give my perspectives on how they handle the external evidences.
 
Steven Avery

Steven Avery

Administrator
Facebook - James Snapp lists and comment
https://www.facebook.com/groups/467217787457422/posts/1441176473394877/?comment_id=1441257636720094

2022 - Text and Canon - The most recent summary, given by Robert Lee Vaughn here
https://textandcanon.org/a-case-for-the-longer-ending-of-mark/

Text and Canon - Details on 6 or so early ones
https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2018/09/mark-169-20-and-early-patristic-evidence.html

Here is 2007
https://bibletranslation.ws/down/snappmark.pdf

See this for his summary list 2020
https://web.archive.org/web/20200207112525/https://www.textexcavation.com/snapp/Evidence.html

Similar
http://www.christianlibrary.org/authors/Jeffrey_W_Hamilton/LVarticles/AuthenticityOfMark16920.html

===============================

Keep in mind

1) the position of James Snapp is actually AGAINST authenticity, his claim otherwise notwithstanding

2) while his ECW work is very good, he is too conservative on some helpful early allussions, where Nicholas Lunn includes many not given by James Snapp. (Hester is worth a check too, even though his position is also de facto contra-authenticity.)

===============================
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top