Threads
Vulgate Prologue - super-evidence - 2 Pages
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.56[/COLOR][/URL]
Vulgate Prologue - super-evidence
Jerome’s Prologue to the Canonical Epistles - English translations
Vulgate prologue and the heavenly witnesses - Wikipedia article - Eustochium to Jerome
Regensburg ms shows Jerome's support of heavenly witnesses text - Fickermann
heavenly witnesses - correcting a limited chronology
bibliography of the Martianay internal arguments used contra Vulgate Prologue authenticity as from Jerome
today the supposed reason for non-authenticity is the tentative assertion that Jerome did not translate the Epistles
Jerome's claim to translate the full New Testament
unraveling the scholarship
Jerome thrice says that he revised the (whole of the) New Testament
reasons why Jerome is considered to be not the author of Acts and Epistles and Revelation
Amy Donaldson references to Jerome
supposed late dating of the Vulgate Prologue was key to the opposition to its authenticity
summarizing the historical arguments contra authenticity - emphasis on Martianay and Benson (Travis section)
Vincent of Lerins - Peregrinus - unknown editor- please, must be somebody other than Jerome!
David Martin shreds frivolous arguments of Martianay and John Mill - Richard Simon
Albert A. Bell and Jerome translating the full Vulgate
wild attempts to find an alternative to Jerome as author of the Prologue - attempt to claim Fuldensis Prologue was later
who was the first to assert that the Prologue was not Jerome? and what reasons did they give?
A. W. Argyle - who was the first to assert that Jerome did not revise the full New Testament
Jerome's five references to translating full Vulgate NT
response of Albert A. Bell to A. W. Argyle paper
Facebook - New Testament Scholarship Worldwide - 2015
Jean Martianay on the Vulgate Prologue
the full Vulgate Prologue chronology from Erasmus to today
Thomas Smith - before Martianay, responding to Sandius and Simon
the full Richard Simon section on the Vulgate Prologue
(end 27)
Potemius of Lisbon
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1115
Victricius of Rouen
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1114
Phoebadius of Agen
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1112
'multiplication of nothings' - searching out the contra Vulgate Prologue authenticity arguments
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1109
Antoine Eugène Genoud
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1111
Jerome's additional references and connections to the heavenly witnesses verse
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1093
Prologue in Codex Cavensis
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1086
research background - Vulgate Prologue, canonical epistles, Fuldensis text
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1080
Is there really any dispute about Jerome's authorship of the Vulgate Prologue?
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1078
why the contras have to deny the clear authenticity of the Vulgate Prologue of Jerome
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1067
John Lupia defends authenticity of heavenly witnesses and Vulgate Prologue
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.959
Jerome, who writes accurately, affirms he revised the entire New Testament
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.956
short thoughts - Steven Avery - on various Vulgate Prologue non-authenticity arguments
https://www.purebibleforum.com/index.php/threads/a.1183/post-5059
