however, the seventh century is as decisive as the
fifth, since both deny the existence of any MS. of the
Vulgate containing the disputed text dating prior to
the tenth century. The La Cava MS. completely
quashes their verdict.
2. The various reading of dicunt for dant in the
seventh verse, common to this and another MS.
presently to be noticed, seems indicative of a still
more ancient common original MS.
3. The addition of Spiritum twice is a very note-
worthy variation.
Has there been any credible rebuttal of the evidence of the La Cava Bible and the reference to Arius? It seems to me, at the moment anyway, that scholarship is not bothered about addressing the...